A Preliminary Study on a Rapid Estimation of People Trapped in the Single Building after Earthquake
-
摘要: 最大限度降低人员伤亡，是震后开展救援工作的首要目标。当地震发生后，快速精确地估计震后人员埋压分布，为救援行动提供方向指导，是震后需要紧急开展的工作。本文在总结前人工作的基础上，提出了一种利用高精度数据开展震后人员埋压分布估计的方法。首先根据实验目的进行数据采集和整理；然后将单体建筑物按照结构类型和使用类型进行划分，在此基础上进行精细尺度人口空间化；最后依据典型建筑物易损性曲线和设定的PGA计算出建筑物破坏情况，进而实现对人员埋压位置的快速估计。本文以天津宝坻城区为研究区，选取了3种典型的震后埋压人员分布评估方法。在设定的2种地震情景下，计算结果显示人员埋压分布在数量上存在差异，但人员埋压分布区域和相对数量高值区一致，均为砖木结构，与之相对的抗震能力较强且建筑年龄较新的框架剪力墙住宅建筑发生震后人员埋压的可能性不大，本研究可为地震应急救援工作提供决策参考。Abstract: Minimizing casualties is the primary goal of post-earthquake relief efforts. When an earthquake occurs, it is urgent to quickly and accurately estimate the location distribution of buried person after the earthquake and to provide guidance for rescue operations. Based on the summary of previous work, this paper proposes a method for estimating the location distribution of victims buried after earthquake with high resolution data. First, data collection and sorting is carried out according to the purpose of the experiment. Then, the individual buildings are divided into structural types and usage types, and fine-scale population spatialization is carried out. Finally, the building damage situation is calculated according to the typical building vulnerability curve and the setting PGA, and then the buried position is quickly estimated. In this paper, taking the urban area of Baodi in Tianjin as the case study, three typical methods for assessing the distribution of buried people were selected. In earthquake scenarios settings, the calculation results showed that there are differences in the distribution of buried personnel in terms of quantity. However, the distribution area and the high-value region of the relative number of buried people were consistent, which is mainly in the brick-timber houses. In comparison, the relatively younger residential buildings with relatively stronger seismic resistance have a minimal likelihood of buried person after earthquake. Our work may provide decision-making reference for earthquake emergency rescue work.
-
Key words:
- Earthquake buried person /
- Rapid assessment /
- Individual building data /
- Refinement
1)1 2https://data.earthquake.cn/ 2)2 3 高武平，姚新强，张文朋等，2020. 宝坻建（构）筑物抗震性能调查与评价—天津市地震灾害风险调查与评估试点工作技术报告. -
图 7 情景1发生在10点钟时的埋压人员分布
Figure 7. Distribution of buried people in earthquake scenario 1 at 10 o'clock
图 8 情景1发生在24点钟时的埋压人员分布
Figure 8. Distribution of buried people in earthquake scenario 1 at 24 o'clock
图 9 情景2发生在10点钟时的埋压人员分布
Figure 9. Distribution of buried people in earthquake scenario 2 at 10 o'clock
-
安立强, 2022. 基于遥感数据的地震极灾区快速评估. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所.An L. Q. , 2022. Rapid damage assessment of extreme earthquake disaster areas based on remote sensing data. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration. (in Chinese) 白仙富, 戴雨芡, 叶燎原等, 2018. 基于高精度房屋、人口数据的地震压埋人员和紧急搜救区评估模型研究. 防灾减灾学报, 34（4）: 1—12Bai X. F. , Dai Y. Q. , Ye L. Y. , 2018. Assessment models of trapped-victim in earthquake & emergency rescue area based on high-precision building and population data. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 34(4): 1—12. (in Chinese) 谷国梁, 安立强, 朱宏等, 2021. 城市地震压埋人员分布评估研究——以天津市区为例. 地震工程学报, 43（6）: 1352—1360Gu G. L. , An L. Q. , Zhu H. , et al. , 2021. Assessment of seismic buried personnel in urban area: a case study of Tianjin urban area, China. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 43(6): 1352—1360. (in Chinese) 李海华, 1987. 震灾最大伤亡率的初步分析. 灾害学, （2）: 41—47Li H. H. , 1987. Preliminary analysis on the highest rate of casualty in earthquake disasters. Journal of Catastrophology, 2(2): 41—47. (in Chinese) 马玉宏, 谢礼立, 2000. 地震人员伤亡估算方法研究. 地震工程与工程振动, 20（4）: 140—147.Ma Y. H., Xie L. L., 2000. Methodologies for assessment of earthquake casualty. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 20(4): 140—147. (in Chinese) 任静, 张方浩, 李志强等, 2021.2021年5月21日云南漾濞6.4级地震灾害损失快速评估结果分析. 震灾防御技术, 16（3）: 454—466Ren J. , Zhang F. H. , Li Z. Q. , et al. , 2021. May 21, 2021, Yangbi, Yunnan MS6.4 analysis of the results of rapid assessment of earthquake disaster losses. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 16(3): 454—466. (in Chinese) 田丽莉, 2012. 地震灾害人员伤亡影响因素分析及人员伤亡估算公式研究. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学. 王东明, 李永佳, 陈洪富等, 2012. 汶川地震与玉树地震自救互救调查情况比较研究. 国际地震动态, （5）: 19—25Wang D. M. , Li Y. J. , Chen H. F. , et al. , 2012. Comparative studies of status of Self Rescue and mutual aid in Wenchuan and Yushu earthquake. Recent Developments in World Seismology, (5): 19—25. (in Chinese) 王紫荆, 陈文凯, 苏浩然等, 2020. 基于区域特征的地震埋压人员评估模型研究. 地震工程学报, 42（5）: 1236—1247Wang Z. J. , Chen W. K. , Su H. R. , et al. , 2020. Evaluation model of earthquake-buried personnel based on the regional characteristics. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 42(5): 1236—1247. (in Chinese) 王紫荆, 2021. 面向地震应急的人员压埋模型研究. 兰州: 中国地震局兰州地震研究所.Wang Z. J. , 2021. Research on personnel burying model for earthquakes emergency. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Institute of Seismology. (in Chinese) 吴兵, 李志强, 齐文华等, 2017. 以乡镇居民地为单元的震后埋压人员分布与救援对策——以乌鲁木齐市为例. 华北地震科学, 35（3）: 13—19Wu B. , Li Z. Q. , Qi W. H. , et al. , 2017. Trapped population distribution in earthquake and rescue policy based on township residential Area scale: a case study of Urumqi Area. North China Earthquake Sciences, 35(3): 13—19. (in Chinese) 吴晨, 殷海涛, 孙庆文等, 2011. 基于ArcGIS的地震搜救信息系统可行性研究. 高原地震, 23（2）: 54—59Wu C. , Yin H. T. , Sun Q. W. , et al. , 2011. Study on the feasibility of the search and rescue information system based on ArcGIS. Plateau Earthquake Research, 23(2): 54—59. (in Chinese) 肖东升, 黄丁发, 陈维锋等, 2009. 地震压埋人员压埋率预估模型. 西南交通大学学报, 44（4）: 574—579Xiao D. S. , Huang D. F. , Chen W. F. , et al. , 2009. Prediction model for buried personnel probabilty in earthquake. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 44(4): 574—579. (in Chinese) 谢江丽, 姚远, 阿布都瓦里斯等, 2021. 城市人口发展与地震救援的思考——以乌鲁木齐市为例. 内陆地震, 35（1）: 100—108. 许建东, 危福泉, 张来泉等, 2008. 地震人员伤亡与压埋人员评估方法的初步研究——以福建省漳州市区为例. 地震研究, 31（4）: 382—387Xu J. D. , Wei F. Q. , Zhang L. Q. , et al. , 2008. Preliminary study on evaluating the number of casualties and trapped victims by an earthquake——A case study of Zhangzhou City, Fujian Province. Journal of Seismological Research, 31(4): 382—387. (in Chinese) 杨明儒, 2014. 地震压埋人员分布评估方法研究. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所.Yang M. R. , 2014. Study on the assessment method of buried personnel distribution in earthquake. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration. (in Chinese) 余世舟, 张令心, 杨明儒, 2015. 地震压埋人员分布评估方法初探. 地震工程与工程振动, 35（2）: 138—143Yu S. Z. , Zhang L. X. , Yang M. R. , 2015. Assessment of buried people distribution after earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 35(2): 138—143. (in Chinese) 郑山锁, 孙龙飞, 龙立等, 2019 a. 城市地震灾害损失评估: 理论方法、系统开发与应用. 北京: 科学出版社. 郑山锁, 张睿明, 陈飞等, 2019 b. 地震人员伤亡评估理论及应用研究. 世界地震工程, 35（1）: 87—96Zheng S. S. , Zhang R. M. , Chen F. , et al. , 2019 b. Research on theory and application of earthquake casualty estimates. World Earthquake Engineering, 35(1): 87—96. (in Chinese) 周中红, 陈文凯, 何少林等, 2019. 基于人口公里格网的地震压埋人员分布评估方法的应用与评价——以甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震为例. 地震研究, 42（2）: 288—294Zhou Z. H. , Chen W. K. , He S. L. , et al. , 2019. Application and evaluation on a evaluating method for distribution of earthquake buried personnel based on population Kilometer Grid: taking Minxian-Zhangxian M6.6 earthquake as an example. Journal of Seismological Research, 42(2): 288—294. (in Chinese) An L. Q. , Zhang J. F. , 2022. Impact of urbanization on seismic risk: a study based on remote sensing data. Sustainability, 14(10): 6132. doi: 10.3390/su14106132 Shinozuka M. , Feng M. Q. , Lee J. , et al. , 2000. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(12): 1224—1231. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224) Wei B. Y., Nie G. Z., Su G. W., et al., 2017. Risk assessment of people trapped in earthquake based on km grid: a case study of the 2014 Ludian earthquake, China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2): 1289—1305. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(10)
计量
- 文章访问数: 35
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 28
- 被引次数: 0
