Research on Discrimination Methods of Near-field and Far-field Long-period Ground Motions Based on Hybrid Machine Learning Models
-
摘要: 长周期地震动因具有丰富的低频成分而易使超高层建筑、大跨桥梁、大型生命线工程等长周期结构产生震害,根据形成机制与特征不同,可分为近场长周期地震动和远场长周期地震动两大类。目前对于长周期地震动的界定方法尚未有统一标准,现有方法多根据单一参数判定,无法表征长周期地震动的复杂特性,且缺少对不同类型长周期地震动的界定。鉴于此,本文从人工多角度提取特征和自动拾取时空联合特征两个角度,分别基于机器学习和深度学习搭建PCA-SVM模型和CNN-LSTM-Attention模型,构建近、远场长周期地震动识别体系,最终分别在测试集上达到了96.01%和97.83%的准确率。结果表明,本文提出的两种分类模型对近、远场长周期地震动均有较好的预测效果,且相较于传统方法具有优越性,可为长周期地震动的识别与选取提供参考。
-
关键词:
Abstract: Long-period ground motions (LPGM), due to their abundant low-frequency components, are prone to causing earthquake damage to long-period structures such as super-high-rise buildings, long-span bridges, and large-scale lifeline engineerings, based on different formation mechanisms and characteristics, they can be divided into near-field long-period ground motions and far-field long-period ground motions. At present, there is no unified standard for the definition of LPGM, existing methods are mostly based on a single parameter, which cannot characterise the complex characteristics of LPGM and lack definition for different types of LPGM. In view of this, the PCA-SVM model and the CNN-LSTM-Attention model based on machine learning and deep learning respectively from two perspectives of manual multi-angle feature extraction and automatic picking up of spatio-temporal joint features to construct the near- and far-field long-period ground motion recognition was built in this study, which finally achieved an accuracy of 96.01% and 97.83% in the test set respectively. The results show that the two classification models proposed in this study have good prediction effects on near-field and far-field long-period ground motions, and have superiority compared with the traditional methods, which can provide a reference for the identification and selection of LPGM.-
Key words:
- Long-period ground motion recognition /
- SVM /
- CNN /
- LSTM /
- Attention Mechanism
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 11
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0