• ISSN 1673-5722
  • CN 11-5429/P

2025年台湾台南6.2级地震灾害特征及损失评估

周坤伯 王自法 赵登科 王雪鉴 王健明 李兆焱

周坤伯,王自法,赵登科,王雪鉴,王健明,李兆焱,2025. 2025年台湾台南6.2级地震灾害特征及损失评估. 震灾防御技术,x(x):1−8. doi:10.11899/zzfy20250063. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250063
引用本文: 周坤伯,王自法,赵登科,王雪鉴,王健明,李兆焱,2025. 2025年台湾台南6.2级地震灾害特征及损失评估. 震灾防御技术,x(x):1−8. doi:10.11899/zzfy20250063. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250063
Zhou Kunbo, Wang Zifa, Zhao Dengke, Wang Xuejian, Wang Jianming, Li Zhaoyan. Seismic Damage Characteristics and Loss Assessment of the MW6.2 Tainan Earthquake in Taiwan, 2025[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250063
Citation: Zhou Kunbo, Wang Zifa, Zhao Dengke, Wang Xuejian, Wang Jianming, Li Zhaoyan. Seismic Damage Characteristics and Loss Assessment of the MW6.2 Tainan Earthquake in Taiwan, 2025[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250063

2025年台湾台南6.2级地震灾害特征及损失评估

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250063
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2023 YFC3805203);国家自然科学基金(52378544、52378543);中国地震局工程力学研究所科学研究基金(2023 A01、2021 B09)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    周坤伯,男,生于2000年。硕士研究生。主要从事地震易损性研究工作。E-mail:13668064622@163.com

    通讯作者:

    王自法,男,生于1965年。研究员,博士生导师。主要从事巨灾风险研究工作。E-mail:zifa@iem.ac.cn

  • 12 https:/landscan.ornl.gov

Seismic Damage Characteristics and Loss Assessment of the MW6.2 Tainan Earthquake in Taiwan, 2025

  • 摘要: 北京时间2025年1月21日0时17分,台湾省台南市发生6.2级地震,震中位于北纬23.24°,东经120.51°,震源深度为10 km。此次地震最大烈度达Ⅸ度,高烈度区主要分布在嘉义县和台南市,但整体震害较轻,具体表现为:部分房屋倒塌或受损严重,结构性破坏主要集中于梁柱构件;非结构性破坏则主要涉及装饰材料、填充墙及吊顶等构件。生命线系统中,桥梁受损较轻,主要破坏形式为桥台变形,道路破坏则以路面隆起与龟裂为主。次生灾害主要包括火灾、电力中断与山体滑坡,其中山体滑坡分布广泛,导致部分生命线设施受损及交通中断等问题。震害调查表明,地震动强度高、房屋建筑质量不高、抗震措施不完备是造成本次地震破坏的主要原因。本文将此次地震的震害特征与2016年高雄美浓6.6级地震进行对比,讨论了美浓地震破坏更严重的原因。此外,本文对比分析了美国地质调查局和本研究团队开发的地震损失评估模型在此次地震中的表现,发现美国地质调查局第一时间发布的经济损失评估偏于保守,人员伤亡评估过于模糊,而本研究团队开发的模型精度更高。
    1)  12 https:/landscan.ornl.gov
  • 图  1  加速度水平分向峰值衰减关系

    Figure  1.  The attenuation relationship for the peak acceleration in horizontal component

    图  2  WTP台站加速度时程信息

    Figure  2.  The acceleration time history information of the WTP station

    图  3  本次地震造成的建筑物破坏

    Figure  3.  The damage to buildings caused by this earthquake

    图  4  生命线破坏

    Figure  4.  The destruction of lifelines

    图  5  次生灾害

    Figure  5.  Secondary disaster

    图  6  美浓地震与台南地震PGA分布图

    Figure  6.  The PGA distribution maps of the Meinong earthquake and the Tainan earthquake

    图  7  美国USGS给出的台南地震震害估计

    Figure  7.  Seismic damage estimates for the Tainan earthquake provided by the USGS

    图  8  本研究组给出的台南地震震害估计

    Figure  8.  Seismic damage estimates for the 2025 Tainan earthquake provided by the team

    表  1  TELES房屋震损评估结果

    Table  1.   The seismic damage estimation from TELES

    县市乡镇区轻微损坏/栋中度损坏/栋严重损坏/栋完全损坏/栋小计/栋
    台南市白河区80111092
    东山区6891078
    楠西区6291072
    玉井区5071058
    嘉义县大浦乡1420016
    台南市后壁区51006
    大内区41005
    六甲区30003
    南化区00000
    合计/栋2864040330
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 国家地震工程研究中心,2002. 建築物損壞評估曲線之建立及應用. (2002-04-01)[2025-02-26]. https://www.ncree.niar.org.tw/accom plishment/technicalreports/page/10309.

    National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering,2002. Establishment and use of building damage assessment curves. (2002-04-01)[2025-02-26]. https://www.ncree.niar.org.tw/accomplishment/technicalreports/page/10309. (in Chinese)
    霍林生,李宏男,肖诗云等,2009. 汶川地震钢筋混凝土框架结构震害调查与启示. 大连理工大学学报,49(5):718−723. doi: 10.7511/dllgxb200905016

    Huo L. S., Li H. N., Xiao S. Y., et al., 2009. Earthquake damage investigation and analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures in Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 49(5): 718−723. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7511/dllgxb200905016
    李宏男,赵衍刚,2005. 日本新潟县中越大地震震害调查及分析. 自然灾害学报,14(1):165−174.

    Li H. N., Zhao Y. G., 2005. Investigation and analysis of Chuetsu earthquake damages in Niigata prefecture, Japan. Journal of Natural Disasters, 14(1): 165−174. (in Chinese)
    刘爱文,夏珊,徐超,2008. 汶川地震交通系统震害及震后抢修. 震灾防御技术,3(3):243−250. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2008.03.006

    Liu A. W., Xia S., Xu C., 2008. Damage and emergency recovery of the transportation systems after Wenchuan earthquake. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 3(3): 243−250. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2008.03.006
    刘绍昌,杨健强,2025. 2023年云南省芒市MS5.0地震震害特征. 震灾防御技术,20(1):86−96. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20230270

    Liu S. C., Yang J. Q., 2025. The characteristics of earthquake damage caused by the MS5.0 earthquake in Mangshi, Yunnan province. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 20(1): 86−96. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/zzfy20230270
    潘毅,张弛,高宪等,2016. 台湾美浓6.7级地震框架结构震害调查与分析. 土木工程学报,49(S1):13−18.

    Pan Y., Zhang C., Gao X., et al., 2016. Earthquake damage investigation and analysis of the RC frame structures in Taiwan Meinung MS6.7 earthquake. China Civil Engineering Journal, 49(S1): 13−18. (in Chinese)
    潘毅,陈子峰,郭欣等,2025. 积石山6.2级地震学校建筑典型震害特征及对人员疏散的启示. 地震工程学报,47(3):610−620,651.

    Pan Y., Chen Z. F., Guo X., et al., 2025. Typical seismic damage characteristics of school buildings caused by the Jishishan MS6.2 earthquake and implications for personnel evacuation. Earthquake Engineering Journal, 47(3): 610−620,651. (in Chinese)
    张升,李兆焱,张思宇等,2022. 2022年日本福岛7.4级地震灾害特征. 地震工程与工程振动,42(5):18−25.

    Zhang S., Li Z. Y., Zhang S. Y., et al., 2022. Disaster characteristics of the 2022 Fukushima M7.4 earthquake in Japan. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamic, 42(5): 18−25. (in Chinese)
    张升,李兆焱,张思宇等,2023. 2023年土耳其7.8级地震灾害特征. 世界地震工程,39(3):45−55.

    Zhang S., Li Z. Y., Zhang S. Y., et al., 2023. Disaster characteristics of Turkey M7.8 earthquake in 2023. World Earthquake Engineering, 39(3): 45−55. (in Chinese)
    赵登科,王自法,李兆焱等,2023. 泸定MS6.8地震房屋损失快速评估. 世界地震工程,39(2):178−188.

    Zhao D. K., Wang Z. F., Li Z. Y., et al., 2023. Rapid assessment of building losses in Luding MS6.8 earthquake. World Earthquake Engineering, 39(2): 178−188. (in Chinese)
    Abrahamson N. A., Silva W. J., Kamai R., 2014. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3): 1025−1055. doi: 10.1193/070913EQS198M
    Liao W. I., Loh C. H., Tsai K. C., 2006. Study on the fragility of building structures in Taiwan. Natural Hazards, 37(1-2): 55−69. doi: 10.1007/s11069-005-4656-x
    United States Geological Survey, 2025. Earthquake hazards program. (2025-01-20)[2025-02-26]. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000pl8h/pager.
    Wang, Z. F., Zhao, D. K., Wang, J. M., et al., 2025. Application of an integrated earthquake loss estimation method in 2024 Hualien MW7.4 earthquake. Natural Hazards, 121(7): 8111−8135. doi: 10.1007/s11069-025-07141-2
    Zhao D. K., Wang Z. F., Wang J. M., et al., 2023. A rapid estimation method for post-earthquake building losses. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 14(3): 428−439. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00491-0
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  29
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-04-08
  • 录用日期:  2025-05-14
  • 修回日期:  2025-05-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-07-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回