• ISSN 1673-5722
  • CN 11-5429/P

液化侧向扩展场地群桩桥梁体系地震响应与失效模式研究

陈吉龙 潘汝江 许成顺 贾科敏

陈吉龙,潘汝江,许成顺,贾科敏,2026. 液化侧向扩展场地群桩桥梁体系地震响应与失效模式研究. 震灾防御技术,x(x):1−14. doi:10.11899/zzfy20250016. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250016
引用本文: 陈吉龙,潘汝江,许成顺,贾科敏,2026. 液化侧向扩展场地群桩桥梁体系地震响应与失效模式研究. 震灾防御技术,x(x):1−14. doi:10.11899/zzfy20250016. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250016
Chen Jilong, Pan Rujiang, Xu Chengshun, Jia Kemin. Research on Seismic Response and Failure Modes of Pile Group Bridge Systems in Liquefaction-induced Lateral Spreading Site[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250016
Citation: Chen Jilong, Pan Rujiang, Xu Chengshun, Jia Kemin. Research on Seismic Response and Failure Modes of Pile Group Bridge Systems in Liquefaction-induced Lateral Spreading Site[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250016

液化侧向扩展场地群桩桥梁体系地震响应与失效模式研究

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250016
基金项目: 国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(52225807);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(52408513)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈吉龙,男,生于2000年。硕士研究生。主要从事岩土地下结构抗震方面的研究。E-mail:c766532843@163.com

    通讯作者:

    许成顺,女,生于1977年。博士后,教授,博士生导师。主要从事土动力学、岩土地震工程方面研究。E-mail:xuchengshun@bjut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: P315.9;TU473.1

Research on Seismic Response and Failure Modes of Pile Group Bridge Systems in Liquefaction-induced Lateral Spreading Site

  • 摘要: 震害调查表明,地震中土体液化引发场地发生侧向扩展致使桩基损伤进而耦联上部结构倒塌的案例常有发生,在近滨海地区的地层中更为显著。此外,斜桩与直桩在地震期间表现出不同的震害特征。基于此,采用高效多尺度全耦合三维精细化数值模拟方法,开展了液化侧向扩展场地直斜群桩桥梁体系地震响应研究。采用变渗透系数模型考虑液化过程中渗透系数的变化,引入主-从薄层接触单元模拟桩-土接触面脱离与滑移。研究结果表明:强震激励下,土体液化后场地发生侧向扩展,上坡桩与下坡桩呈现相反的轴向响应。桩基与土体之间出现明显的脱离、滑移,传统的绑定接触不适用于侧向扩展场地。斜桩与直桩在近场表现出不同的变形模式,上部结构沿不同的方向发生弯曲变形。与直桩相比,斜桩表现出更显著的桩钉效应,能够更有效地抵抗场地侧向扩展,明显降低土体、桩基、上部结构水平位移与加速度响应,提高体系抗震性能。但在工程设计中,需要重点关注斜桩体系的竖向位移。
  • 图  1  典型三层土液化倾斜场地群桩桥梁体系

    Figure  1.  Pile group system for a typical three-layer soil inclined liquefaction sites

    图  2  液化倾斜场地群桩桥梁体系三维模型及细节

    Figure  2.  Liquefiable sloping ground soil-pile group-bridge structure model and details

    图  3  变渗透系数模型示意图

    Figure  3.  Variable permeability coefficient model

    图  4  Ottawa砂土(Dr=40%&90%)试验与数值模拟结果比较

    Figure  4.  Comparison between experimental and numerical simulations for Ottawa sand with Dr(40%&90%)

    图  5  材料特性试验

    Figure  5.  Material property tests

    图  6  桩-土点面主从动力非线性接触模型

    Figure  6.  Pile-soil dynamic nonlinear contact model

    图  7  加速度时程与HUSID图

    Figure  7.  Acceleration time history and HUSID plots

    图  8  傅里叶谱

    Figure  8.  Acceleration spectrum

    图  9  试验与数值模拟对比

    Figure  9.  Comparison between experimental and numerical results

    图  10  自由场土体EPWPR时程图

    Figure  10.  Time history of EPWPR in free-field

    图  11  土-结体系水平位移云图(HBB)

    Figure  11.  Cloud map of the horizontal displacement of the soil-structure system(HBB)

    图  12  斜群桩桥梁体系竖向位移云图(HBB)

    Figure  12.  Cloud map of the vertical displacement of the system(HBB)

    图  13  斜桩竖向位移和轴力沿埋深分布

    Figure  13.  Vertical displacement and axial force of batter pile with burial depth

    图  14  群桩结构体系响应云图(40 s)

    Figure  14.  Contour plots of structural response

    图  15  桩基水平位移峰值沿埋深分布

    Figure  15.  Peak horizontal displacement of the pile foundation along depth

    图  16  桩基轴力最大值沿埋深分布

    Figure  16.  Pile axial forces with burial depth

    图  17  桩基弯矩最大值沿埋深分布

    Figure  17.  Pile bending moments with burial depth

    图  18  桩基剪力最大值沿埋深分布

    Figure  18.  Pile shear forces with burial depth

    图  19  承台与上部结构水平位移

    Figure  19.  Horizontal displacement of the pile cap and superstructure

    图  20  上部结构加速度

    Figure  20.  Acceleration time histories of the cap and superstructure

    图  21  上部结构加速度反应谱

    Figure  21.  Acceleration response spectrum

    表  1  土材料参数

    Table  1.   Soil parameters

    参数 黏土 参数 松砂 密砂
    密度ρclay/(t/m3) 1.6 密度ρsand/(t/m3) 1.8 1.989
    剪切模量Gc/kPa 15 剪切模量GS/kPa 82 105
    粘聚力cu/kPa 33 摩擦角φTXC/° 31 38.5
    峰值剪应变γmax 0.1 峰值剪应变γmax 0.1 0.1
    参考围压Pr/kPa 100 参考围压Pr/kPa 101 101
    压力系数n 0.5 压力系数n 0.5 0.5
    屈服面数 20 相变角φPT 26.8 34
    摩擦角φTXC 0 剪缩参数c1 0.61 0.076
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  混凝土结构截面材料

    Table  2.   Steel and concrete properties for the structure section

    钢筋材料 混凝土材料
    参数取值参数取值
    保护层核心区
    屈服强度fy/MPa785混凝土抗压强度fc/MPa−25.45−28.0
    弹性模量E/GPa200混凝土极限强度fcu/MPa−5.09−5.6
    应力硬化比b0.01混凝土峰值强度对应应变εc−0.003−0.005
    弹塑性控制参数R0=18混凝土压碎时对应的应变εcu−0.01−0.025
    CR1=0.925混凝土弹性模量Ec/MPa21.021.0
    CR2=0.15
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 陈婷婷, 2018. 液化场地斜桩抗震性能的离心机试验和数值分析. 北京: 清华大学.

    Chen T. T., 2018. Centrifuge test and numerical study on the seismic behavior of batter pile foundation in lateral spreading soil. Beijing: Tsinghua University. (in Chinese)
    幸思佳, 潘军, 2023. 孟加拉国帕德玛大桥施工关键技术. 世界桥梁, 51(S1): 41−47.

    Xing S. J., Pan J., 2023. Key construction techniques of Padma Bridge in Bangladesh. World Bridges, 51(S1): 41−47. (in Chinese)
    AFPS, AFTES, 2001. Guidelines on Earthquake Design and Protection of Underground Structures. Paris: AFPS/AFTES.
    Arduino P. , Ashford S. , Assimaki D. , et al. Geo-engineering reconnaissance of the 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake. (2010-05-25)[2025-02-07]. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cenv_fac/212/
    Berrill J. B., Christensen S. A., Keenan R. P., et al., 2001. Case study of lateral spreading forces on a piled foundation. Géotechnique, 51(6): 501−517. doi: 10.1680/geot.51.6.501.40462
    Bhattacharya S., Madabhushi S. P. G., 2008. A critical review of methods for pile design in seismically liquefiable soils. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6(3): 407−446. doi: 10.1007/s10518-008-9068-3
    Bhattacharya S., Tokimatsu K., Goda K., et al., 2014. Collapse of Showa Bridge during 1964 Niigata earthquake: a quantitative reappraisal on the failure mechanisms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 65: 55−71. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.05.004
    Bian W. W., Wu J. C., Lei B. C., et al., 2023. Detection of pre-seismic deformation of 2021 Maduo M7.4 earthquake by using ASF HYP3. IET Conference Proceedings, 2023(47): 4178−4182. doi: 10.1049/icp.2024.1785
    Borgese P. , 2024. Analisi numerica di travi Gerber soggette a corrosione e valutazione di possibili interventi di rinforzo = numerical analysis of half-joints subjected to corrosion and evaluation of possible retrofitting interventions. Torino: Politecnico di Torino.
    Brauer S. A. , 2014. Damage identification of an offshore wind turbine jacket support structure. Trondheim: Institutt for Marin Teknikk.
    Chang D. D. , 2007. Inertial and lateral spreading demands on soil-pile-structure systems in liquefied and laterally spreading ground during earthquakes. Davis: University of California, Davis.
    Elbadawy M. A., Zhou Y. G., Chen Y. M., 2024. An improved pressure dependent multi-yield surface model: calibration and validation. Computers and Geotechnics, 172: 106445. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106445
    Escoffier S., 2012. Experimental study of the effect of inclined pile on the seismic behavior of pile group. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 42: 275−291. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.007
    European Committee for Standardization, 2004. EN 1998−5 Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. Brussels: CEN.
    Fujino Y., Hashimoto S., Abe M., 2005. Damage analysis of Hanshin expressway viaducts during 1995 Kobe earthquake. I: residual inclination of reinforced concrete piers. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10(1): 45−53.
    Giannakou A., Gerolymos N., Gazetas G., et al., 2010. Seismic behavior of batter piles: elastic response. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(9): 1187−1199. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000337
    Joque D. T. , Huggins M. , Rusten A. , 2001. Design/build delivery of the Schnitzer steel wharf and seawall, Tacoma, Washington. In: Ports '01: America's Ports: Gateway to the Global Economy. Norfolk: ASCE, 1−10.
    Kastranta G. , Gazetas G. , Tazoh T. , 1998. Performance of three quay walls in Maya Wharf: Kobe 1995. In: European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Paris: A. A. Balkema.
    Li Z., Escoffier S., Kotronis P., 2016. Centrifuge modeling of batter pile foundations under sinusoidal dynamic excitation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(3): 673−697. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9859-2
    Liu K. Y., Xu C. S., Xu H. B., et al., 2022. Experimental study on load-transfer mechanism and failure mode of batter pile under oblique uplift loading. International Journal of Geomechanics, 22(12): 04022231. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002475
    McManus K. , Turner J. P. , Charton G. , 2005. Inclined reinforcement to prevent soil liquefaction. In: Proceedings of the 2005 NZSEE Conference. Taupo: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 523−533.
    Moss R. E. S., Kayen R. E., Tong L. Y., et al., 2011. Retesting of liquefaction and nonliquefaction case histories from the 1976 Tangshan earthquake. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(4): 334−343. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000406
    Motamed R., Towhata I., Honda T., et al., 2013. Pile group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: E-defense large shake table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51: 35−46. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.007
    Pan R. J., Xu C. S., Meite R., et al., 2024. Seismic performance of pile groups under liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: insights from advanced numerical modeling. Buildings, 14(10): 3125. doi: 10.3390/buildings14103125
    Rajeswari J. S., Sarkar R., 2021. Seismic behavior of batter pile groups embedded in liquefiable soil. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(3): 583−604. doi: 10.1007/s11803-021-2040-9
    Rajeswari J. S., Sarkar R., 2024. Adequacy of batter piles under seismic conditions: a review of past performances and investigations. Structures, 61: 106022. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106022
    Ramirez J., Barrero A. R., Chen L., et al., 2018. Site response in a layered liquefiable deposit: evaluation of different numerical tools and methodologies with centrifuge experimental results. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(10): 04018073. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001947
    Seed R. B., Dickenson S. E., Idriss I. M., 1991. Principal geotechnical aspects of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Soils and Foundations, 31(1): 1−26. doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.31.1
    Shahir H., Mohammadi-Haji B., Ghassemi A., 2014. Employing a variable permeability model in numerical simulation of saturated sand behavior under earthquake loading. Computers and Geotechnics, 55: 211−223. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.09.007
    Song J., Ma X. L., Jia K. M., et al., 2022. An explicit finite difference method for dynamic interaction of damped saturated soil site-pile foundation-superstructure system and its shaking table analysis. Buildings, 12(8): 1186. doi: 10.3390/buildings12081186
    Tazoh T., Sato M., Jang J., 2010. Centrifuge tests on pile foundation-structure systems affected by liquefaction-induced soil flow after quay wall failure. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A, 66(1): 133−147. doi: 10.2208/jsceja.66.133
    Xu C. S., Dou P. F., Du X. L., et al., 2020. Large shaking table tests of pile-supported structures in different ground conditions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 139: 106307. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106307
    Youd T. L., Perkins D. M., 1987. Mapping of liquefaction severity index. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 113(11): 1374−1392. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:11(1374)
    Yu J. S., Yong P., Read S., et al., 2010. The MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquake of 12 May 2008 reconnaissance report. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 43(1): 41−83. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.43.1.41-83
  • 加载中
图(21) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  22
  • HTML全文浏览量:  22
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-02-07
  • 录用日期:  2025-03-17
  • 修回日期:  2025-03-09
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-03-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回