• ISSN 1673-5722
  • CN 11-5429/P

西藏定日6.8级地震震灾分析及启示

马星宇 陈相兆 张桂欣 闫佳琦 王楠

马星宇,陈相兆,张桂欣,闫佳琦,王楠,2025. 西藏定日6.8级地震震灾分析及启示. 震灾防御技术,20(1):13−23. doi:10.11899/zzfy20250015. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250015
引用本文: 马星宇,陈相兆,张桂欣,闫佳琦,王楠,2025. 西藏定日6.8级地震震灾分析及启示. 震灾防御技术,20(1):13−23. doi:10.11899/zzfy20250015. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250015
Ma Xingyu, Chen Xiangzhao, Zhang Guixin, Yan Jiaqi, Wang Nan. Seismic Disaster Analysis and Lessons Learned from Dingri M6.8 Earthquake in Xizang[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2025, 20(1): 13-23. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250015
Citation: Ma Xingyu, Chen Xiangzhao, Zhang Guixin, Yan Jiaqi, Wang Nan. Seismic Disaster Analysis and Lessons Learned from Dingri M6.8 Earthquake in Xizang[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2025, 20(1): 13-23. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250015

西藏定日6.8级地震震灾分析及启示

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20250015
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3005701)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    马星宇,男,生于1999年。博士研究生。主要从事地震灾害风险评估工作。E-mail:maxingyu0919@163.com

  • 12 https://content-static.cctvnews.cctv.com/snow-book/index.html?item_id=3283485830666282881&toc_style_id=feeds_default&share_to=copy_url&track_id=48 e8789 e4-4431-01 a-9530-9 f0519348979
  • 23 https://content-static.cctvnews.cctv.com/snow-book/index.html?item_id=5044664183872965898&t=1736249291596&toc_style_id=feeds_default&share_to=copy_url&track_id=c27 cbf14-cf67-4733-8229-6792 e2 b3815 c
  • 34 http://www.ninhm.ac.cn/content/details_52_5160.html
  • 45 强震动数据获取自:DOI:10.12080/nedc.gc_qzd.ds00001.2025;CSTR:12166.11.nedc.gc.qzd.ds00001.2025。

Seismic Disaster Analysis and Lessons Learned from Dingri M6.8 Earthquake in Xizang

  • 摘要: 2025年1月7日9时,西藏定日县发生6.8级地震。截至1月9日6时,此次地震造成了126人遇难,影响场内死亡率高达0.3%。基于台站数据、现场建筑物建(构)造特征等信息,从危险性、承灾体等多角度进行分析,提出此次地震灾害较为严重的可能原因:(1)当地传统民居多为土/石木结构,整体结构性能和延性较差,在地震作用下易产生严重破坏。更为重要的是,这些建筑往往采用的是外围护墙和内部木框架承担土/石木楼板的结构形式,在地震中大量内部木框架歪闪、与墙体分离,没有拉结的屋面和木屋架向房屋内部塌落,造成严重人员伤亡。(2)地震动强度大,有台站记录的水平向峰值加速度最高达到784 cm/s2。且近场地震动短周期成分丰富,竖向地震动作用明显,对震区大量分布的本就较为松散的低层建筑破坏力较大。(3)震区位于西部高海拔地区,地震发生时刚刚日出,天气寒冷,大部分受灾群众尚未外出,人员在室率高。由于高海拔地区的环境和气候恶劣,救援难度较大,导致人员生存率低。根据震害原因,建议在少数民族地区坚持“保持原有传统建筑风格、就地取材、引导建设抗震结构”和“尊重民族习俗、低扰动、价格低廉”的原则,全面推进既有建筑抗震能力提升和新建建筑抗震设防。
    1)  12 https://content-static.cctvnews.cctv.com/snow-book/index.html?item_id=3283485830666282881&toc_style_id=feeds_default&share_to=copy_url&track_id=48 e8789 e4-4431-01 a-9530-9 f0519348979
    2)  23 https://content-static.cctvnews.cctv.com/snow-book/index.html?item_id=5044664183872965898&t=1736249291596&toc_style_id=feeds_default&share_to=copy_url&track_id=c27 cbf14-cf67-4733-8229-6792 e2 b3815 c
    3)  34 http://www.ninhm.ac.cn/content/details_52_5160.html
    4)  45 强震动数据获取自:DOI:10.12080/nedc.gc_qzd.ds00001.2025;CSTR:12166.11.nedc.gc.qzd.ds00001.2025。
  • 图  1  地震震区地形与余震序列分布图

    Figure  1.  Map of topography and aftershock sequence

    图  2  地震调查烈度分布图

    Figure  2.  Map of surveyed seismic intensity

    图  3  震区建筑分布与面积占比

    Figure  3.  Distribution and the area ratio of buildings

    图  4  震区典型土木建筑震前照片和模型

    Figure  4.  Typical photo and model of stone and wood buildings in epicentral area

    图  5  震区土木建筑女儿墙、门垛及典型震害

    Figure  5.  Typical earthquake damages of stone-wood buildings with parapet walls in the epicentral area

    图  6  震区土木建筑结构设置及典型震害

    Figure  6.  Typical earthquake damages of soil-wood buildings in the epicentral area

    图  7  震区土木建筑楼板及典型震害

    Figure  7.  Typical earthquake damages of soil-wood buildings in the epicentral area

    图  8  地震台站记录PGA分布和典型台站位置 4

    Figure  8.  Map of PGA and location of typical sites

    图  9  典型台站时程记录

    Figure  9.  Time series of typical site

    图  10  典型台站记录反应谱

    Figure  10.  Response spectrum of typical site

    表  1  西藏定日6.8级地震震区建筑物结构占比

    Table  1.   The proportion of building structures in the epicentral area

    烈度总面积/m2砌体结构/m2框架结构/m2钢结构/m2其他结构/m2单层/m2
    Ⅸ度2132023902423721991863740
    Ⅷ度73829130817175933296601220
    Ⅶ度19012901299743467671287914104921178
    Ⅵ度923349333371124941701266556111105167853
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 陈洪富,戴君武,孙柏涛等,2011. 玉树7.1级地震人员伤亡影响因素调查与初步分析. 地震工程与工程振动,31(4):18−25.

    Chen H. F., Dai J. W., Sun B. T., et al., 2011. Investigation report on influence factors of casualties in April 14, 2010 Yushu earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 31(4): 18−25. (in Chinese)
    陈相兆,孙柏涛,闫培雷,2017. 四川康定6.3级地震灾害分布特点及结构震害简析. 地震工程与工程振动,37(2):1−9.

    Chen X. Z., Sun B. T., Yan P. L., 2017. The characteristics of earthquake disasters distribution and seismic damage to structures in Kangding M s6.3 earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 37(2): 1−9. (in Chinese)
    格桑卓玛(小),2023. 日喀则市道路结冰特征及其天气环流概念模型. 西藏科技,45(10):35−42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3403.2023.10.008
    黄思凝,袁一凡,孟庆利等,2011. 由玉树地震结构震害看村镇房屋抗震. 世界地震工程,27(2):77−82.

    Huang S. N., Yuan Y. F., Meng Q. L., et al., 2011. Study on seismic resistance of rural houses based on earthquake damage to buildings in Yushu earthquake. World Earthquake Engineering, 27(2): 77−82. (in Chinese)
    黄婷,吴中海,韩帅等,2024. 西藏日喀则地区的活断层基本特征及地震灾害潜在风险评估. 地震科学进展,54(10):696−711.

    Huang T., Wu Z. H., Han S., et al., 2024. The basic characteristics of active faults in the region of Xigaze, Xizang and the assessment of potential earthquake disaster risks. Progress in Earthquake Sciences, 54(10): 696−711. (in Chinese)
    史大成,2009. 基于GIS的场地分类新方法研究. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所.

    Shi D. C., 2009. Study on new methods of site classification based on GIS. Harbin:Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration. (in Chinese)
    王言侨,李祥秀,王宁等,2025. 西藏定日6.8级地震民居震害原因分析. 地震工程学报,1−12[2025-01-27]. https://doi.org/ 1 0.20000/j.1000-0844.20250113001. Doi: 0.20000/j.1000-0844.20250113001

    Wang Y.Q., Li X.X., Wang N., et al., 2025. Analysis of the causes of earthquake damage to residential buildings in the M S 6.8 Dingri earthquake,Xizang.China Earthquake Engineering Journal,1−12. (in Chinese)
    许力生,陈运泰,1999. 1997年中国西藏玛尼MS7.9地震的时空破裂过程. 地震学报,21(5):449−459. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.1999.05.001
    姚新强,2011. 规则平面西藏单层砌体打包带加固抗震试验与有限元模拟分析. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所.

    Yao X. Q., 2011. Polypropylene band strengthening seismic test on Tibet single masonry of regular plane and finite element simulation analysis. Harbin:Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration. (in Chinese)
    应急管理部,中国地震局,2025. 应急管理部 中国地震局发布西藏定日6.8级地震烈度图. (2025-01-10)[2025-01-27]. https://www.cea.gov.cn/cea/xwzx/fzjzyw/5790712/index.html.
    中华人民共和国中央人民政府,2025. 西藏定日县地震,最新消息. (2025-01-07)[2025-01-27]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/shipin/202501/content_6997555.htm.
    周华伟,Murphy M. A.,林清良,2002. 西藏及其周围地区地壳、地幔地震层析成像−−印度板块大规模俯冲于西藏高原之下的证据. 地学前缘,9(4):285−292. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2002.04.008

    Zhou H. W., Murphy M. A., Lin Q. L., 2002. Tomographic imaging of the Tibet and surrounding region: evidence for wholesale under thrusting of Indian slab beneath the Tibetan Plateau. Earth Science Frontiers, 9(4): 285−292. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2002.04.008
    Sun B. T., Yan P. L., 2015. Damage characteristics and seismic capacity of buildings during Nepal MS8.1 earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(3): 571−578. doi: 10.1007/s11803-015-0046-x
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  33
  • HTML全文浏览量:  7
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-01-27
  • 录用日期:  2025-03-07
  • 修回日期:  2025-02-22
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-04-18
  • 刊出日期:  2025-03-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回