Cooperative Rescue Analysis of Regional Medical System Based on Simulation of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Strong Earthquake Scenario
-
摘要: 对伤亡人员的救治是震后应急救援工作的首要内容,医疗系统作为救治伤员的主力,其震后的功能损失和恢复能力决定了震后救援的效率。本文选取区域尺度的医疗系统,通过情景构建的方法研究强震情景下的区域协调救援。首先对震中城市的震后供需状态、医疗系统救援能力进行分析,并考虑道路系统损失对震后救援的影响,分析城市震后应急救援能力。在城市医疗系统不足以支撑自身救援的情况下,考虑区域其他城市协同救援,对周边城市医疗系统救援能力进行分析,协同救援的城市需遵循城市内外两层供需平衡的逻辑,统筹考虑周边城市的资源容量限制与总救援时间最小化问题,从而选择最优救援方案,为京津冀区域强震情景下协同救援提供思路。Abstract: The treatment of casualties is the primary content of post-earthquake emergency rescue work. As the main force of treating the injured, the efficiency of post-earthquake rescue is determined by the functional loss and recovery ability of the medical system. In this paper, regional scale medical system is selected for research, and regional coordinated rescue under regional strong earthquake scenario is studied by scenario construction method. First, by analyzing the post-earthquake supply and demand state of the epicenter city, the rescue capacity of the medical system, and considering the impact of the loss of the road system on the rescue after the earthquake, the emergency rescue capacity of the city after the earthquake is analyzed. In the case that the urban medical system is not enough to support its own rescue, the rescue capacity of the medical system of the surrounding cities should be analyzed by considering the coordinated rescue of other cities in the region. The coordinated rescue cities should follow the logic of the supply and demand balance between the two levels inside and outside the city. And it should take into account the resource capacity limitation of the surrounding cities and the minimization of the total rescue time, so as to select the optimal rescue plan. It provides ideas for coordinated rescue in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region.
-
表 1 数据来源总结
Table 1. Summary of data source
数据类型 数据来源 统计截止时间 医院设施点数据 百度地图、统计年鉴、BIGEMAP平台 2023年12月 交通网络数据 BIGEMAP平台 2023年12月 城市居住区数据 百度地图、统计年鉴、BIGEMAP平台 2023年12月 城市人口数据 统计年鉴 2023年12月 表 2 强震下研究区内不同破坏状态道路占比
Table 2. Proportion of roads with different damage states in the study area under strong earthquakes
破坏状态 路段数量占比/% 基本完好 29 轻微破坏 49 中等破坏 11 严重破坏 9 损毁 2 表 3 各区县对唐山市医疗对点救援情况
Table 3. Medical point-to-point rescue of Tangshan by districts and counties
需救援区县 缺乏床位数量/个 外来救援区县
唐山市丰南区 3000 天津市(河北区、红桥区、南开区) 丰润区 3865 北京市(密云区、石景山区、西城区) 路南区 7653 天津市(南开区、武清区、滨海新区、静海区);唐山市(曹妃甸区);廊坊市(大城县、文安县) 路北区 19969 天津市(宝坻区、北辰区、西青区);廊坊市(固安县、永清县、霸州市、广阳区、安次区、大厂县、
三河市、香河县);北京市(大兴区、朝阳区、通州区、朝阳区、东城区)古冶区 9287 唐山市(迁安市、迁西县);承德市(承德县、平泉县、宽城县);秦皇岛市(海港区、山海关区、
北戴河区、青龙区);天津市(河西区、河东区、和平区)开平区 8745 承德市(双滦区、双桥区);天津市(蓟州区);北京市(顺义区、平谷区、朝阳区) 遵化市 62 承德市(滦平县) 滦州市 1011 秦皇岛市(昌黎县、卢龙县、抚宁区) 滦南县 890 唐山市(乐亭县);天津市(东丽区、河西区) 天津市 宁河区 204 天津市(河北区) -
陈达强,郑文创,丁夏等,2009. 带时变供求约束的应急物资分配模型. 物流技术,28(2):90−92.Chen D. Q., Zheng W. C., Ding X., et al., 2009. Emergency materials distribution model with time-varying demand and supply constraints. Logistics Technology, 28(2): 90−92. (in Chinese) 段满珍,轧红颖,李珊珊等,2017. 震害道路通行能力评估模型. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),36(5):79−85.Duan M. Z., Ya H. Y., Li S. S., et al., 2017. Assessment model for traffic capacity after seismic disaster. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 36(5): 79−85. (in Chinese) 费智涛,郭小东,刘朝峰等,2020. 基于系统视角的城市医疗系统地震韧性评估方法研究. 地震研究,43(3):431−440. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2020.03.002Fei Z. T., Guo X. D., Liu C. F., et al., 2020. Research on earthquake resilience assessment method of urban medical system based on system perspective. Journal of Seismological Research, 43(3): 431−440. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2020.03.002 郭小东,郭桂君,王志涛,2022. 城市尺度下医疗系统抗震韧性评估策略. 城市与减灾,(5):28−32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2022.05.007Guo X. D., Guo G. J., Wang Z. T., 2022. Assessment of earthquake-proof resilience in medical system at urban scale. City and Disaster Reduction, (5): 28−32. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2022.05.007 贾战超,2018. 区域抗震防灾应急服务设施规划布局方法研究. 天津:河北工业大学. Jia Z. C. ,2018. Research on the Emergency Service facilities layout planning Method of Regional earthquake disaster prevention. Tianjin:Hebei University of Technology. (in Chinese). 靳曰森,2008. 城市地震次生火灾风险与震后医疗救援分析研究. 北京:北京工业大学. Jin Y. S. ,2008. Study on the urban secondary fire risk and medical rescue system after earthquake. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology. (in Chinese). 刘恢先,1985. 唐山大地震震害(第一分册). 北京:地震出版社. 刘恢先,1986. 唐山大地震震害(第二分册). 北京:地震出版社. 刘兴旺,姚赟胜,朱俊文等,2024. 河西走廊西端文殊山南缘断裂新活动特征. 地震工程学报,46(6):1395−1404.Liu X. W., Yao Y. S., Zhu J. W., et al., 2024. New activity characteristics of the southern Wenshushan fault in the western Hexi Corridor. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 46(6): 1395−1404. (in Chinese) 刘子艺,郭小东,王志涛等,2021. 空间尺度下城市医疗系统震后应急救援能力评估与韧性提升策略. 地震工程与工程振动,41(5):196−205.Liu Z. Y., Guo X. D., Wang Z. T., et al., 2021. Assessment of emergency rescue capability and resilience improvement strategy of urban medical system after earthquake in spatial scale. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 41(5): 196−205. (in Chinese) 刘子艺,2021. 韧性理念下城市医疗系统震后救援能力评估与提升策略. 北京:北京工业大学. Liu Z. Y. ,2021. Resilience concept of urban medical system post-earthquake rescue capability evaluation and improvement strategy. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology. (in Chinese). 潘毅,彭鑫,王腾等,2024. 泸定6.8级地震医疗建筑震害调查与分析. 建筑结构学报,45(5):14−29.Pan Y., Peng X., Wang T., et al., 2024. Seismic damage investigation and analysis of hospital buildings in MS 6.8 Luding earthquake. Journal of Building Structures, 45(5): 14−29. (in Chinese) 裴顺顺,翟长海,胡杰,2025. 区域医疗系统抗震韧性综述. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,57(1):1−12.Pei S. S., Zhai C. H., Hu J., 2025. Review of seismic resilience of regional healthcare systems. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 57(1): 1−12. (in Chinese) 苏幼坡,张玉敏,2006. 唐山大地震震害分布研究. 地震工程与工程振动,26(3):18−21.Su Y. P., Zhang Y. M., 2006. Research on distribution of disasters in Tangshan Earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 26(3): 18−21. (in Chinese) 王慧彦,王建飞,迟宝明等,2021. 京津冀地区大震灾害应急专项预案编制研究. 城市与减灾,(6):7−14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2021.06.003Wang H. Y., Wang J. F., Chi B. M., et al., 2021. Study on special emergency preplan compiling for major earthquake disaster in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei region. City and Disaster Reduction, (6): 7−14. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2021.06.003 王慧彦,王建飞,刘晓静等,2023. 基于情景构建的强震后京津冀地区协同应急机制研究. 地震研究,46(1):138−146.Wang H. Y., Wang J. F., Liu X. J., et al., 2023. Study on regional cooperative emergency response mechanism in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region after strong earthquakes based on scenario construction. Journal of Seismological Research, 46(1): 138−146. (in Chinese) 王纪武,沈雨嫣,毛旦毅等,2024. 城市医疗设施系统网络韧性研究与规划对策−−以郑州市主城区为例. 城市规划,48(8):90−100.Wang J. W., Shen Y. Y., Mao D. Y., et al., 2024. Resilience of urban medial facilities system network and planning strategies: a case study of the main urban area of Zhengzhou. City Planning Review, 48(8): 90−100. (in Chinese) 王威,贾文雪,缪惠全等,2024. 基于“源体力”理论的城市抗震安全韧性评估. 工程力学,1−12(2024-07-14). http://kns. cnki. net/kcms/detail/11.2595. O3.20240710. 2113.009. html. Wang W. ,Jia W. X. ,Miao H. Q. ,et al. ,2024. Urban seismic safety resilience evaluation based on "risk source-risk exposure-mitigation force" theory. Engineering Mechanics,1−12(2024-07-14). http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2595.O3.20240710.2113.009.html. (in Chinese). 许卫晓,孙景江,林淋等,2012. 烈度快速评估中的实时修正方法研究. 地震工程与工程振动,32(4):34−39.Xu W. X., Sun J. J., Lin L., et al., 2012. Study on real-time correction methods in rapid assessment of seismic intensity distribution. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 32(4): 34−39. (in Chinese) 尹之潜,杨淑文,2004. 地震损失分析与设防标准. 北京:地震出版社. 张猛,2020. 震后救灾视角下城市医疗设施救援能力与布局合理性研究. 北京:北京工业大学. Zhang M. ,2020. Study on rescue capability and layout rationality of urban medical facilities from the perspective of post-earthquake rescue. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology. (in Chinese). 张珊珊,万永革,王晓山等,2022. 1976年唐山大地震库仑破裂应力对唐山及邻近地区地震的影响. 华北地震科学,40(1):7−14.Zhang S. S., Wan Y. G., Wang X. S., et al., 2022. The influence of the coulomb failure stress following the 1976 Tangshan earthquakes on earthquakes in Tangshan and its adjacent area. North China Earthquake Sciences, 40(1): 7−14. (in Chinese) Cheng Q. L., Liu Z. X., Xie L. L., et al., 2024. Post-earthquake medical functionality assessment methods and enhancement strategies for hospital inpatient buildings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 110: 104639. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104639 Gulzari A., Tarakci H., 2021. A healthcare location-allocation model with an application of telemedicine for an earthquake response phase. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55: 102100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102100 Jiang H. J., Bu H. F., He L. S., 2022. A new method for function-loss based seismic resilience assessment of buildings. Engineering Structures, 266: 114613. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114613 Liu K. N., 2022. GIS-based MCDM framework combined with coupled multi-hazard assessment for site selection of post-earthquake emergency medical service facilities in Wenchuan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 73: 102873. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102873 Shang Q. X., Wang T., Li J. C., 2020. Seismic resilience assessment of emergency departments based on the state tree method. Structural Safety, 85: 101944. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101944 Xu Z., Wu Y. Y., Hao X. T., et al., 2022. A joint analysis method for capability and demand of post-earthquake medical rescue in a city. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 80: 103249. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103249 -