Shallow Structure and Quaternary Activity Characteristics of Handong Fault
-
摘要: 邯东断裂为太行山山前断裂以东的一条隐伏断裂，是华北平原坳陷区内邯郸凹陷的东界断裂，位于邯郸东部新区规划建设范围内。研究其空间分布特征和活动性对于地震危险性评价及城区重大工程项目选址具有重要意义。本文采用浅层地震勘探、钻孔联合剖面探测和年代学测试方法，对邯东断裂的展布特征及第四纪活动性进行系统研究，共布设跨断裂浅层地震勘探测线6条、钻孔联合地质剖面3条。综合分析表明，邯东断裂为一条近NNE-SSE走向的高角度正断层，倾向W，视倾角约50°~75°。断裂上断点埋深南浅北深，最新活动时代为中更新世晚期。中更新世早期，南段与北段相比较为活跃。Abstract: The Handan fault is a concealed fault located east of the Taihang Mountain Piedmont Fault, serving as the eastern boundary of the Handan Depression in the North China Plain Depression. This fault lies within the planning and construction zone of the Eastern Handan New Area. Studying the spatial distribution characteristics and activity of the Handan fault is crucial for earthquake risk assessment and the site selection of major regional engineering projects. This paper systematically analyzes the distribution characteristics and Quaternary activities of the Handan fault by using shallow seismic exploration, a drilling joint profiling method, and chronology. Six shallow seismic exploration lines and three drilling joint geological sections across the fault have been conducted. Comprehensive analysis reveals that the Handan fault is a NNE-SSE trending normal fault with a westward dip and an apparent dip angle of about 50° to 75°. The upper breakpoint of the fault is shallow in the south and deep in the north, with the latest active period occurring in the late Middle Pleistocene. In the early Middle Pleistocene, the southern segment was more active than the northern segment.
-
Key words:
- Handong fault /
- Shallow seismic exploration /
- Drilling joint profiling /
- Activities
1)1 2 杨红宾，张兆袆，李锋等，2014. 1：25万邯郸市幅区域地质调查报告. 河北省地质调查院，106—185. 张兆袆，樊延恩，徐永利等，2014. 区域地质调查专题研究报告—第四纪地质结构与古气候环境演变（邢台市幅，邯郸市幅，1∶25万）. -
表 1 浅层地震勘探测线参数
Table 1. Parameters of shallow seismic exploration lines
测线名称 道间距/m 接收道数 炮间距/m 覆盖次数 有效炮数（物理点数） CK-1 3 360 12 45 150 CK-2 3 360 12 45 285 CK-3 5 480 15 80 360 XK-4 3 436 12 54 128 CK-5 5 480 15 80 340 CK-7 5 480 15 80 450 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 年龄样品测试结果
Table 2. The dating results of the samples
样品编号 钻孔 埋深/m U/(ug·g−1) Th/(ug·g−1) K2O/% 含水量/% 古剂量/Gy 年剂量/(Gy·ka−1) 年龄/ka C-ESR-5 HDZKC 102.90 2.81 13.25 2.36 12 1 770±354 3.54 500±100 D-ESR-2 HDZKD 104.10 3.02 15.33 2.44 15 2 406±481 3.64 661±132 F-ESR-3 HDZKF 104.40 2.69 15.95 2.49 12 2 446±220 3.79 645±58 F-ESR-4 HDZKF 114.40 2.37 12.18 2.16 13 2 566±513 3.19 804±161 LZE-ESR-2 LZZKE 109.35 2.43 14.28 1.02 15 823±117 2.35 350±50 LZE-ESR-4 LZZKE 117.90 2.38 10.35 2.08 16 1 263±193 3.27 386±58 ESR-FA-3 FXZKA 117.30 2.23 12.20 2.18 18 2 225±399 2.97 749±134 ESR-FC-1 FXZKC 97.30 2.04 10.83 1.75 16 1 341±83 2.6 516±32 ESR-FF-1 FXZKF 97.50 2.16 11.08 1.67 25 1 258±48 2.29 549±21 ESR-FF-3 FXZKF 118.06 2.61 14.00 2.28 27 1 904±277 2.84 670±97
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 CK-2、XK-4、CK-5场地第四系厚度
Table 3. Summary of Quaternary stratum thickness at CK-2、XK-4 and CK-5 sites
场地 钻孔 厚度/m 全新统 上更新统孟观组 中更新统魏县组 下更新统杨柳青组（未钻穿） CK-2 HDZKA 25.20 43.30 38.60 42.90 HDZKB 25.60 42.60 41.35 15.00 HDZKC 25.10 43.40 40.80 22.10 HDZKD 24.50 43.90 43.50 7.60 HDZKE 25.40 43.20 44.40 35.70 HDZKF 25.90 42.75 44.70 41.80 XK-4 LZZKA 26.90 39.10 68.60 17.80 LZZKB 27.00 39.20 53.84 — LZZKC 26.42 39.70 53.25 — LZZKD 27.09 39.30 67.40 1.60 LZZKE 26.50 39.50 54.55 — LZZKF 27.00 38.35 72.45 14.73 LZZKB’ 26.30 38.70 70.60 — CK-5 FXZKA 25.15 40.20 52.25 3.52 FXZKB 25.35 40.00 — — FXZKC 25.22 40.90 — — FXZKD 24.90 40.35 — — FXZKE 24.30 41.30 — — FXZKF 24.35 40.60 56.30 2.10
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 浅层地震探测结果
Table 4. Shallow seismic survey results
测线名称 断点编号 性质 断点位置（CDP/桩号） 视倾向 视倾角/(°) 断距/m 可分辨的上断点埋深/m CK-1 F1 正 347/ 1219 W 60～70 17（TQ1） 190 CK-2 F2 正 676/ 1353 W 60～75 3（TQ2） 107 CK-3 F3 正 1853/1957 W 50～60 11（TQ1） 166 XK-4 F4 正 581/ 1292 W 65 4（TQ2） 132 CK-5 F5 正 903/ 1472 W 65～75 4（TQ2） 105 CK-7 F6 正 1433 /1737 W 50～65 6（TQ2） 110
下载: 导出CSV
-
邓起东,卢造勋,杨主恩,2007. 城市活动断层探测和断层活动性评价问题. 地震地质,29(2):189−200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2007.02.001Deng Q. D., Lu Z. X., Yang Z. E., 2007. Remarks on urban active faults exploration and associated activity assessment. Seismology and Geology, 29(2): 189−200. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2007.02.001 高景华,徐明才,2012. 地震方法确定活动断裂上断点的影响因素分析. 地震地质,34(2):338−347. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2012.02.012Gao J. H., Xu M. C., 2012. Analysis of influencing factors in determining the upper offset point of active faults using seismic method. Seismology and Geology, 34(2): 338−347. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2012.02.012 高战武,吴昊,李光涛等,2014. 太行山山前断裂带中北段晚第四纪活动性研究. 震灾防御技术,9(2):159−170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2014.02.001Gao Z. W., Wu H., Li G. T., et al., 2014. Late quaternary activity of the central−north segment of Taihang Mountain piedmont fault zone. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 9(2): 159−170. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2014.02.001 何强,李录明,赖敏等,2004. 凤凰山地区蒲江−新津−德阳隐伏断裂反射波法地震勘探与断裂活动性研究. 地震地质,26(4):706−715. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2004.04.016He Q., Li L. M., Lai M., et al., 2004. Seismic reflection surveying of the Pujiang-Xinjin-Deyang buried fault in Fenghuangshan area and the study of fault activity. Seismology and Geology, 26(4): 706−715. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2004.04.016 何正勤,陈宇坤,叶太兰等,2007. 浅层地震勘探在沿海地区隐伏断层探测中的应用. 地震地质,29(2):363−372. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2007.02.014He Z. Q., Chen Y. K., Ye T. L., et al., 2007. Application of shallow seismic exploration in detection of buried fault in coastal areas. Seismology and Geology, 29(2): 363−372. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2007.02.014 花鑫升,石金虎,谭雅丽等,2018. 浅层地震勘探资料揭示汤东断裂特征. 震灾防御技术,13(2):276−283. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20180203Hua X. S., Shi J. H., Tan Y. L., et al., 2018. The characteristics of the Tangdong fault revealed by shallow seismic survey. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 13(2): 276−283. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/zzfy20180203 李涛,王志铄,高家乙等,2022. 兰聊断裂南段构造样式与最新活动性分析. 震灾防御技术,17(2):278−293. doi: 10.11899/j.issn.1673-5722.2022.2.zzfyjs202202009Li T., Wang Z. S., Gao J. Y., et al., 2022. Structural style and latest activity analysis of the southern segment of the Lanliao fault. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 17(2): 278−293. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/j.issn.1673-5722.2022.2.zzfyjs202202009 商世杰,丰成君,谭成轩等,2019. 雄安新区附近主要隐伏断裂第四纪活动性研究. 地球学报,40(6):836−846. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2019.033101Shang S. J., Feng C. J., Tan C. X., et al., 2019. Quaternary activity study of major buried faults near Xiongan New Area. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 40(6): 836−846. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2019.033101 沈军,戴训也,肖淳等,2022. 夏垫西断裂的晚第四纪活动性. 地震地质,44(4):909−924. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.04.006Shen J., Dai X. Y., Xiao C., et al., 2022. Study on the late quaternary activity of the West Xiadian fault in Beijing Plain. Seismology and Geology, 44(4): 909−924. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.04.006 向宏发,王学潮,郝书俭等,2000. 聊城−兰考隐伏断裂的第四纪活动性−中国东部平原区一条重要的隐伏活动断裂. 中国地震,16(4):307−315. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2000.04.002Xiang H. F., Wang X. C., Hao S. J., et al., 2000. Activity of Liaocheng−Lankao buried fault in Quaternary. Earthquake Research in China, 16(4): 307−315. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2000.04.002 姚守皓,2015. 邯郸市第四纪岩石地层与年代地层划分与对比. 北京:中国地质大学(北京).Yao S. H. ,2015. Quaternary lithostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy division and correlation in Handan urban area. Beijing:China University of Geosciences. (in Chinese) 章龙胜,周本刚,计凤桔等,2016. 广东信宜−廉江断裂带东支西南段断裂活动性研究. 地震地质,38(2):316−328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.02.007Zhang L. S., Zhou B. G., Ji F. J., et al., 2016. Fault activity of the southwestern segment of the eastern branch of Xinyi−Lianjiang fault zone in Guangdong province. Seismology and Geology, 38(2): 316−328. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.02.007 张鹏,张媛媛,许汉刚等,2019. 苏锡常断裂的第四纪活动性. 地震地质,41(5):1172−1184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.05.007Zhang P., Zhang Y. Y., Xu H. G., et al., 2019. Research on the characteristics of Quaternary activities of Su-Xi-Chang fault. Seismology and Geology, 41(5): 1172−1184. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.05.007 张鹏,许奎,范小平等,2021. 镇江地区主要NW向断裂的第四纪活动性. 地震地质,43(1):144−157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.01.009Zhang P., Xu K., Fan X. P., et al., 2021. Research on the characteristic of quaternary activities of NW-trending faults in Zhenjiang area. Seismology and Geology, 43(1): 144−157. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.01.009 张晓亮,张磊,蔡向民等,2016. 北京平原区黄庄−高丽营断裂北段结构特征及活动特点研究. 中国地质,43(4):1258−1265. doi: 10.12029/gc20160412Zhang X. L., Zhang L., Cai X. M., et al., 2016. A study of structure and activity characteristics of the northern segment of Huangzhuang−Gaoliying fault in Beijing plain area. Geology in China, 43(4): 1258−1265. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12029/gc20160412 章振铨,刘昌森. 2001. 上海两条隐伏第四纪断裂的研究. 地震地质, 23 (4):545−555.Zhang Z. Q. , Liu C. S. , 2001. Research on two buried Quaternary faults in Shanghai. Seismology and Geology, 23 (4): 545−555. (in Chinese) -
点击查看大图
图(10) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 67
- HTML全文浏览量: 30
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0
