考虑构件地震相关性的近海桥梁二维地震易损性分析

任文静; 邱大鹏; 张智; 柳春光

doi:10.11899/zzfy20240110

考虑构件地震相关性的近海桥梁二维地震易损性分析

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20240110

1.
济南职业学院, 设备基建处, 济南 250110
2.
山东建筑大学, 土木工程学院, 济南 250101
3.
大连理工大学, 建设工程学部, 大连 116024

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（52208397）；山东省高等学校青创科技支持计划（2023KJ123）；山东省自然科学基金（ZR2020QE280、ZR2021QE126）

详细信息

作者简介:
任文静，女，生于1992年。硕士，工程师。主要从事房屋建筑、结构抗震及易损性研究工作。E-mail：renwj0801@126.com

通讯作者:
邱大鹏，男，生于1992年。博士，副教授。主要从事大型结构抗震性能评价研究工作。E-mail：qiudapeng20@sdjzu.edu.cn

12 https://peer.berkeley.edu/
计量
- 文章访问数: 52
- HTML全文浏览量: 14
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-28
- 刊出日期: 2024-03-31

The Two-dimensional Seismic Fragility Analysis of the Offshore Bridge in Considering the Seismic Correlation between Different Components

1.
Equipment Infrastructure Division, Jinan Vocational College, Jinan 250110, China
2.
School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
3.
Faculty Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

摘要

摘要: 为了更加全面合理地评价我国近海桥梁结构的抗震性能，本研究开展了考虑氯离子侵蚀的简支梁桥二维地震易损性研究。以我国近海潮汐环境中某简支梁桥为例，基于IDA方法考虑了氯离子侵蚀对结构的不利影响，并模拟了桥梁的地震响应过程；选取合适的板式橡胶支座和桥墩损伤指标并得到了各自的地震易损性曲线，揭示了两构件之间地震的内在相关性，进一步基于相关性分析方法明确了两构件的相关系数，得到了桥梁结构合理的二维地震易损性曲线。结果表明，板式橡胶支座和桥墩之间的地震需求与抗震能力均存在密切的相关性，基于不同构件地震相关性的二维易损性曲线可以更加全面地评价桥梁结构的抗震性能。研究成果可以为近海桥梁抗震设计和地震风险评估提供科学依据与技术支持。
- 近海桥梁 /
- 氯离子侵蚀 /
- IDA方法 /
- 构件地震相关性 /
- 二维地震易损性分析
Abstract: In order to evaluate the seismic performance of the offshore bridge in China, the two-dimensional seismic fragility analysis of the offshore simply supported beam bridge in considering the chloride ion erosion is conducted in this paper. Taking a concrete bridge in the offshore tidal environment as an example, the adverse effects the chloride ion erosion on structure are investigated. The seismic response of bridge structure is simulated based on the IDA method. The appropriate damage indexes of plate rubber bearing and pier are selected, and seismic fragility curves are obtained. The internal correlation mechanism of seismic responses between two components is revealed, and the correlation coefficients between different components are proposed based on the correlation analysis method. Finally, the reasonable two-dimensional seismic fragility curves of the bridge structure are achieved. The results show that the correlations of the seismic demand and seismic capacity between plate rubber bearings and piers are significant, and the two-dimensional seismic fragility curves based on the correlation of different components can more comprehensively evaluate the seismic performance of the bridge structure. Our results are helpful in providing scientific basis and technical support for seismic design and seismic risk assessment of offshore bridges.
- Offshore bridge /
- Chloride ion erosion /
- IDA method /
- Component seismic correlation /
- Two-dimensional seismic fragility analysis
注释:

1) 12 https://peer.berkeley.edu/

HTML全文

图 1 桥梁结构简图

Figure 1. Simplified structure diagram of bridge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 地震动加速度反应谱

Figure 2. Acceleration response spectrum of ground motions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 桥墩截面划分

Figure 3. Division of pier section

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 结构有限元模型

Figure 4. Finite element model of structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 各构件地震需求的对数回归分析

Figure 5. Logarithmic regression analysis of seismic responses of each component

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 板式橡胶支座与桥墩的地震易损性曲线

Figure 6. Fragility curves of laminated rubber bearing and pier

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 桥梁结构地震易损性曲线界限

Figure 7. Upper and lower bounds of seismic fragility curves of the bridge system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 二维联合性能极限状态曲线示意图

Figure 8. Schematic diagram of limit state curves of two-dimensional combined performance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 桥梁结构二维地震易损性曲线

Figure 9. 2-D seismic fragility curves of the bridge system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 材料参数统计结果

Table 1. Statistical results of material parameters

随机变量	单位	分布类型	均值	标准差	变异系数
f_y	MPa	正态分布	388.27	28.59	0.074
f_c	MPa	正态分布	26.11	4.44	0.161
E	MPa	正态分布	204000	2040	0.08
W	kN/m³	正态分布	26.25	2.60	0.10

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 算例桥梁材料本构参数

Table 2. Constitutive parameters of example bridge material

样本编号	约束混凝土			桥墩纵筋
样本编号	峰值应力/MPa	峰值应变	极限应力/MPa	极限应变	屈服强度/MPa	直径/mm
1	28.56	0.0041	5.71	0.0112	358.53	24.66
2	31.18	0.0039	6.24	0.0107	362.60	24.66
3	33.80	0.0038	6.76	0.0102	366.67	24.66
4	26.78	0.0044	5.36	0.0119	370.74	24.66
5	29.41	0.0042	5.88	0.0113	374.81	24.66
6	32.04	0.0040	6.41	0.0108	378.88	24.66
7	34.66	0.0038	6.93	0.0103	382.95	24.66
8	27.63	0.0044	5.53	0.0120	387.02	24.66
9	30.27	0.0042	6.05	0.0114	391.10	24.66
10	32.89	0.0040	6.58	0.0109	395.17	24.66
11	35.52	0.0039	7.10	0.0104	399.24	24.66
12	28.49	0.0044	5.70	0.0121	403.31	24.66
13	31.12	0.0042	6.22	0.0115	407.38	24.66
14	33.75	0.0040	6.75	0.0110	411.45	24.66
15	36.37	0.0039	7.27	0.0106	415.52	24.66

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 桥墩损伤指标

Table 3. Damage indices of piers

名称	轻微损伤	中等损伤	严重损伤	完全损伤
位移延性比	1	1.3224	2.1327	3

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 板式橡胶支座损伤指标

Table 4. Damage indices of laminated rubber bearings

名称	轻微损伤	中等损伤	严重损伤	完全损伤
位移/m	0.05	0.075	0.1	0.125

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 构件地震需求汇总结果

Table 5. Summary of component earthquake demand

PGA/g	板式橡胶支座			桥墩
PGA/g	对数均值	对数标准差	变异系数	对数均值	对数标准差	变异系数
0.05	−4.979	0.318	−0.064	−2.642	0.171	−0.065
0.10	−4.189	0.234	−0.056	−1.920	0.149	−0.078
0.15	−3.796	0.245	−0.065	−1.561	0.221	−0.142
0.20	−3.417	0.323	−0.095	−1.219	0.199	−0.163
0.25	−3.292	0.305	−0.093	−1.049	0.272	−0.259
0.30	−2.975	0.369	−0.124	−1.008	0.861	−0.855
0.35	−2.924	0.314	−0.107	−0.618	0.213	−0.344
0.40	−2.740	0.370	−0.135	−0.422	0.256	−0.607
0.45	−2.595	0.277	−0.107	−0.298	0.284	−0.954
0.50	−2.438	0.459	−0.188	−0.180	0.352	−1.958
0.55	−2.223	0.297	−0.134	0.078	0.294	3.770
0.60	−2.115	0.361	−0.171	0.177	0.306	1.727
0.65	−2.041	0.359	−0.176	0.175	0.318	1.815
0.70	−1.978	0.305	−0.154	0.358	0.283	0.790
0.75	−1.855	0.370	−0.200	0.528	0.318	0.602
0.80	−1.707	0.439	−0.257	0.642	0.335	0.522
0.85	−1.799	0.365	−0.203	0.625	0.336	0.538
0.90	−1.597	0.441	−0.276	0.506	0.926	1.829
0.95	−1.523	0.412	−0.271	0.615	0.932	1.515
1.00	−1.529	0.364	−0.238	0.638	0.745	1.167

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 不同地震作用下构件相关系数

Table 6. Correlation coefficients under different earthquakes

PGA/g	相关系数	λ	N	PGA/g	相关系数	λ	N
0.05	0.902	0.846	1.182	0.55	0.830	0.821	1.217
0.10	0.881	0.844	1.185	0.60	0.846	0.819	1.221
0.15	0.862	0.841	1.189	0.65	0.887	0.816	1.225
0.20	0.856	0.839	1.192	0.70	0.830	0.814	1.228
0.25	0.780	0.836	1.196	0.75	0.795	0.812	1.232
0.30	0.726	0.834	1.199	0.80	0.781	0.809	1.236
0.35	0.813	0.831	1.203	0.85	0.794	0.807	1.240
0.40	0.833	0.829	1.206	0.90	0.800	0.804	1.244
0.45	0.801	0.826	1.210	0.95	0.808	0.802	1.248
0.50	0.806	0.824	1.214	1.00	0.823	0.799	1.251

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

谷音, 李晓芳, 2018. 考虑氯离子侵蚀的近海桥梁结构地震易损性分析. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 27（5）: 1019—1032

Gu Y. , Li X. F. , 2019. Seismic fragility analysis of offshore bridge structure considering chloride erosion. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 27(5): 1019—1032. (in Chinese)

韩建平, 周帅帅, 2020. 考虑非结构构件损伤的钢筋混凝土框架建筑多维地震易损性分析. 地震工程与工程振动, 40（1）: 39—48

Han J. P. , Zhou S. S. , 2020. Multi-dimensional seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete framed building considering damage of non-structural components. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 40(1): 39—48. (in Chinese)

李超, 李宏男, 2014. 考虑氯离子腐蚀作用的近海桥梁结构全寿命抗震性能评价. 振动与冲击, 33（11）: 70—77

Li C. , Li H. N. , 2014. Life-cycle aseismic performance evaluation of offshore bridge structures considering chloride ions corrosion effect. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 33(11): 70—77. (in Chinese)

李宏男, 成虎, 王东升, 2018. 桥梁结构地震易损性研究进展述评. 工程力学, 35（9）: 1—16

Li H. N. , Cheng H. , Wang D. S. , 2018. A review of advances in seismic fragility research on bridge structures. Engineering Mechanics, 35(9): 1—16. (in Chinese)

柳春光, 任文静, 夏春旭, 2016. 考虑钢筋腐蚀的近海隔震桥梁地震易损性分析. 自然灾害学报, 25（6）: 120—129

Liu C. G. , Ren W. J. , Xia C. X. , 2016. Vulnerability analysis of offshore isolation bridges considering reinforcement corrosion. Journal of Natural Disasters, 25(6): 120—129. (in Chinese)

刘健新, 葛胜锦, 2014. 日本公路桥梁抗震设计规范释义. 北京: 人民交通出版社.

Liu J. X. , Ge S. J. , 2014. Interpretations of Japan code for seismic design of highway bridges. Beijing: China Communications Press. (in Chinese)

刘骁骁, 吴子燕, 王其昂, 2017. 基于多维性能极限状态的概率地震需求分析. 振动与冲击, 36（1）: 181—187, 206

Liu X. X. , Wu Z. Y. , Wang Q. A. , 2017. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis based on multi-dimensional performance limit states. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36(1): 181—187, 206. (in Chinese)

任文静, 2017. 近海桥梁地震易损性及风险分析. 大连: 大连理工大学.

Ren W. J. , 2017. Seismic vulnerability and risk analysis of the offshore bridge. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology.

宋帅, 钱永久, 吴刚, 2017. 基于多元Copula函数的桥梁体系地震易损性分析方法研究. 振动与冲击, 36（9）: 122—129, 208

Song S. , Qian Y. J. , Wu G. , 2017. Seismic fragility analysis of a bridge system based on multivariate copula function. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36(9): 122—129, 208. (in Chinese)

王其昂, 吴子燕, 贾兆平, 2013. 桥梁系统地震多维易损性分析. 工程力学, 30（10）: 192—198

Wang Q. A. , Wu Z. Y. , Jia Z. P. , 2013. Multi-dimensional fragility analysis of bridge system under earthquake. Engineering Mechanics, 30(10): 192—198. (in Chinese)

吴文朋, 李立峰, 2018. 桥梁结构系统地震易损性分析方法研究. 振动与冲击, 37（21）: 273—280

Wu W. P. , Li L. F. , 2018. System seismic fragility analysis methods for bridge structures. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 37(21): 273—280. (in Chinese)

项梦洁, 王宪杰, 王思文等, 2021. 随机激励下多塔结构BRB布置优化及多维易损性评估. 土木工程学报, 54（3）: 19—28

Xiang M. J. , Wang X. J. , Wang S. W. , et al. , 2021. BRB layout optimization and multi-dimensional fragility evaluation of multi-tower structure under stochastic excitation. China Civil Engineering Journal, 54(3): 19—28.

郑凯锋, 陈力波, 庄卫林等, 2013. 基于概率性地震需求模型的桥梁易损性分析. 工程力学, 30（5）: 165—171, 187

Zheng K. F. , Chen L. B. , Zhuang W. L. , et al. , 2013. Bridge vulnerability analysis based on probabilistic seismic demand models. Engineering Mechanics, 30(5): 165—171, 187. (in Chinese)

Buckle I., Friedland I., Mander J., et al., 2006. Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures. Part 1, bridges. Washington, D. C. : Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (U. S. ).

Caltrans Y., 2013. Seismic design criteria, Version 1.7. Sacramento: Seismic Design Criteria.

Choi E. , Desroches R. , Nielson B. , 2004. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures, 26(2): 187—199. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006

Cimellaro G. P., Reinhorn A. M., Bruneau M., et al., 2006. Multidimensional fragility of structures: formulation and evaluation. New York: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

Cornell C. A. , Jalayer F. , Hamburger R. O. , et al. , 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4): 526—533. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)

Ghosh J. , Padgett J. E. , 2010. Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(12): 1497—1511. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000260

Hwang H., Liu J. B., Chiu Y. H., 2001. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. Memphis: The University of Memphis.

Nielson B. G. , Desroches R. , 2007. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(6): 823—839.

Pan Y. , Agrawal A. K. , Ghosn M. , 2007. Seismic fragility of continuous steel highway bridges in New York State. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 12(6): 689—699. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(689)

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计