外包钢套加固震损双层高架桥框架式桥墩抗震性能评估与参数分析

许成祥; 吴永康; 王理

doi:10.11899/zzfy20230416

外包钢套加固震损双层高架桥框架式桥墩抗震性能评估与参数分析

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20230416

武汉科技大学，城市建设学院, 武汉 430065

基金项目: 湖北省自然科学基金（创新群体）（2015CFA029）

详细信息

作者简介:
许成祥，男，生于1965年。教授。主要从事钢-混凝土组合结构抗震性能、工程结构损伤识别与修复研究。E-mail：cx_xu@sina.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 34
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-10
- 刊出日期: 2023-12-01

Parameter Analysis and Evaluation on Seismic Performance of Seismic-damaged Frame Piers of Double-deck Viaduct Strengthened by Steel Jacket

School of Urban Construction, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China

摘要

摘要: 基于《公路桥梁抗震设计规范》“两阶段”设防原则，采用SAP2000有限元软件建立震损加固桥墩数值模型，通过构建与设防水准地震相匹配的结构性能水准，选取基底剪力和墩顶位移作为结构性能评价指标，建立基于能力需求比的双层高架桥墩抗震性能评估流程，从抗震性能和损伤修复效果角度，对外包钢套含钢量和强度的影响进行分析。研究结果表明，中度损伤试件经外包钢套加固后基底剪力和墩顶位移能力需求比分别提高了76.72%、62.93%，重度损伤试件经外包钢套加固后基底剪力和墩顶位移能力需求比分别提高了62.98%、51.94%；当外包钢套含钢量ρ<0.98%时，重度损伤加固试件基底剪力能力需求比呈负向增长，承载能力修复效果不理想；当外包钢套含钢量ρ>2.08%时，中度损伤及重度损伤加固试件墩顶位移能力需求比提高率大于基底剪力，此时变形能力修复效果优于承载能力；提高外包钢套强度显著增强了中度损伤和重度损伤加固试件承载能力，但变形能力基本不提高。
- 双层框架式桥墩 /
- 地震损伤 /
- 外包钢套加固 /
- 抗震性能 /
- 参数分析
Abstract: Based on the “ two-stage ” fortification principle of bridge specification, SAP2000 finite element software was used to establish the numerical model of seismic damage reinforced piers. By constructing the structural performance level matched with the fortification level earthquake, the base shear force and the displacement of pier top were selected as the structural performance evaluation indexes, and the seismic performance evaluation process of double-layer viaduct pier based on the capacity-demand ratio was established. From the perspective of seismic performance and damage repair effect, the parametric influence analysis on the content of outsourcing steel and the strength of outsourcing steel sleeve was completed. The results show that the base shear and pier top displacement capacity requirements of the moderate damage reinforced specimens are increased by 76.72 % and 62.93 % respectively, and the severe damage reinforced specimens are increased by 62.98 % and 51.94 % respectively. When the outsourcing steel content ρ < 0.98 %, the base shear capacity demand ratio of severe damage reinforced specimens increases negatively, and the bearing capacity repair effect is not ideal. When ρ > 2.08 %, the increase rate of displacement capacity demand ratio of moderate damage and severe damage reinforced specimens is greater than that of base shear, and the repair effect of deformation capacity is better than that of bearing capacity. The bearing capacity of the strengthened specimens with moderate and severe damage is significantly enhanced by increasing the strength of the wrapped steel sleeve, but the deformation capacity is basically not improved.
- Double-deck viaduct /
- Earthquake damage /
- Outsourcing steel sleeve reinforcement /
- Seismic performance /
- Parameter analysis

HTML全文

图 1 试件配筋设计（单位：mm）

Figure 1. Reinforcement design of specimen （Unit: mm）

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 试件加固设计（单位：mm）

Figure 2. Reinforcement design of specimen （Unit: mm）

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 试验加载装置

Figure 3. Test loading device

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 试验加载制度

Figure 4. Test loading system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 整体单元布置

Figure 5. Overall unit layout

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 截面纤维划分

Figure 6. Sectional fiber division

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 模拟与试验结果对比

Figure 7. Comparison of simulation and test results

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 塑性铰编号

Figure 8. Plastic hinge number

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 塑性铰区截面弯矩M₃-转角R₃关系曲线

Figure 9. Curve of plastic hinge zone for section bending moment M₃ and rotation angle R₃

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 规范反应谱

Figure 10. Specification response spectrum

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 基于能力需求比的抗震性能评估流程

Figure 11. Seismic performance evaluation process based on capacity-demand ratio

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 不同外包钢套含钢量下能力需求比曲线

Figure 12. Capacity requirements ratio curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 不同外包钢套含钢量下能力需求比提高率曲线

Figure 13. Increase rate curve of capability requirement ratio

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 不同外包钢套强度等级下能力需求比曲线

Figure 14. Capacity requirements ratio curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 不同外包钢套强度等级下能力需求比提高率曲线

Figure 15. Increase rate curve of capacity requirement ratio

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 试件预损参数

Table 1. Pre-damage parameters of specimens

试件编号	地震损伤程度	预损加载位移/mm	加固状态
FP-0（对比试件）	—	0	—
FP-1	—	0	外包钢套加固
FP-2	中度	36	外包钢套加固
FP-3	重度	63	外包钢套加固

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 钢材力学性能

Table 2. Measured mechanical properties of steel

钢材名称	钢材型号	屈服强度/MPa	极限强度/MPa	弹性模量/ MPa
箍筋	HPB300	279.3	478.6	2.1×10⁵
纵筋	HRB400	377.5	576.8	2.0×10⁵
角钢	L50×5	279.3	478.6	2.1×10⁵
缀板	−40×4	369.8	569.4	2.1×10⁵

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 约束混凝土本构参数

Table 3. Constitutive parameters of confined concrete

加固状态	约束水平	有效约束系数u_e	有效约束应力f_l	抗压强度提高系数γ	峰值应变提高系数β
未加固墩柱	无约束	—	—	—	—
未加固墩柱	箍筋	0.268	0.29	1.08	1.40
加固墩柱	外包钢套	0.478	1.15	1.31	2.55
加固墩柱	外包钢套+箍筋	0.268	1.54	1.40	3.00

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 损伤折减系数

Table 4. Damage reduction coefficient

试件编号	损伤程度	损伤指数D_m	强度折减系数α_F	刚度折减系数α_k
FP-2	中度损伤	0.44	0.88	0.38
FP-3	重度损伤	0.81	0.61	0.23

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 E2水准地震动参数

Table 5. E2 level ground motion parameters

名称	时间间隔/s	有效持续时间/s	有效峰值加速度/g	调幅系数
RG₁	0.010	25.00	0.350	1.00
RG₂	0.010	30.00	0.350	1.00
GM₁	0.005	31.40	0.053	6.60
GM₂	0.010	42.35	0.167	2.09
GM₃	0.010	33.50	0.072	4.86
GM₄	0.020	28.22	0.132	2.65
GM₅	0.005	38.40	0.144	2.43

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 结构性能目标

Table 6. Structural performance objectives

地震设防水准	结构性能水准	结构损伤状态	损伤定性描述	结构性能状态	损伤定量描述
E1	Ⅰ	中等/可修复损伤	表层混凝土发生剥落	稍加修理即可继续使用	表层混凝土达到剥落应变时的截面初始塑性转角R_spall
E2	Ⅱ	局部失效/倒塌机制	核心区混凝土压酥破坏	不出现倒塌，保证生命安全	核心区混凝土达到极限压应变时的截面容许塑性转角R_limit

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 双设防水准下的能力需求比

Table 7. Capacity requirements ratio at double defence levels

试件编号	E1地震设防水准下的基底剪力能力需求比	E2地震设防水准下的墩顶位移能力需求比
FP-0	2.32	3.35
FP-1	5.14	7.56
FP-2	4.10	5.46
FP-3	3.78	5.09

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

陈林之, 蒋欢军, 吕西林, 2010. 修正的钢筋混凝土结构Park-Ang损伤模型. 同济大学学报（自然科学版）, 38（8）: 1103—1107

Chen L. Z. , Jiang H. J. , Lyu X. L. , 2010. Modified Park-Ang damage model for reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 38(8): 1103—1107. (in Chinese)

陈宗平, 周春恒, 李志彬, 2019. 角钢螺旋筋复合约束混凝土组合柱轴压性能及承载力计算. 土木工程学报, 52（1）: 8—19 doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2019.01.002

Chen Z. P. , Zhou C. H. , Li Z. B. , 2019. Axial compressive behavior and load-bearing capacity of concrete column confined with steel angle and circular spiral. China Civil Engineering Journal, 52(1): 8—19. (in Chinese) doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2019.01.002

邓江东, 宗周红, 黎雅乐等, 2013. 粘钢加固损伤混凝土箱型桥墩的抗震性能Ⅱ: 动力响应数值分析. 东南大学学报（自然科学版）, 43（6）: 1280—1287

Deng J. D. , Zong Z. H. , Li Y. L. , et al. , 2013. Anti-seismic properties of damaged concrete bridge piers with hollow cross-section strengthened with adhering steel platesⅡ: numerical analysis on seismic dynamic responses. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 43(6): 1280—1287. (in Chinese)

李磊, 罗光喜, 王卓涵等, 2020. 震损钢筋混凝土柱剩余能力的数值模型. 工程力学, 37（12）: 52—67 doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.12.0789

Li L. , Luo G. X. , Wang Z. H. , et al. , 2020. Numerical model for the residual seismic capacity of seismically damaged reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Mechanics, 37(12): 52—67. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.12.0789

刘杰东, 2015. 震损钢筋混凝土框架滞回模型研究. 重庆: 重庆大学.

Liu J. D., 2015. Research on modeling of hysteretic characteristics of RC frames damaged during earthquake. Chongqing: Chongqing University. (in Chinese)

刘黎明, 徐超, 卜春尧等, 2021. 双向水平地震动作用对某钢筋混凝土连续梁桥易损性的影响. 震灾防御技术, 16（4）: 671—679 doi: 10.11899/j.issn.1673-5722.2021.4.zzfyjs202104008

Liu L. M. , Xu C. , Bu C. Y. , et al. , 2021. Influence of bi-directional horizontal ground motion on the vulnerability of a reinforced concrete continuous beam bridge. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 16(4): 671—679. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/j.issn.1673-5722.2021.4.zzfyjs202104008

彭天波, 李建中, 胡世德等, 2004. 双层高架桥的抗震性能. 同济大学学报（自然科学版）, 32（10）: 1355—1359

Peng T. B. , Li J. Z. , Hu S. D. , et al. , 2004. Seismic performance of double-deck viaduct. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 32(10): 1355—1359. (in Chinese)

司炳君, 孙治国, 杜修力等, 2011. 钢筋混凝土桥墩地震弯剪破坏机理与震后快速修复技术研究. 土木工程学报, 44（7）: 90—99 doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2011.07.011

Si B. J. , Sun Z. G. , Du X. L. , et al. , 2011. Study on the seismic flexural-shear damage mechanisms and rapid repair techniques for earthquake damaged bridge piers. China Civil Engineering Journal, 44(7): 90—99. (in Chinese) doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2011.07.011

苏佶智, 刘伯权, 宋猛等, 2021. 基于应变能耗储的钢筋混凝土框架结构地震损伤演化研究. 震灾防御技术, 16（3）: 533—543 doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210313

Su J. Z. , Liu B. Q. , Song M. , et al. , 2021. Research on seismic damage evolution of reinforced concrete frame structures based on strain-energy consumption-storage theory. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 16(3): 533—543. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210313

孙治国, 管璐, 赵泰儀等, 2020. CFRP修复震后RC桥墩分析模型与抗震性能. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 28（4）: 878—889 doi: 10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2020.04.011

Sun Z. G. , Guan L. , Zhao T. Y. , et al. , 2020. Analysis model and seismic behavior of repaired RC bridge piers after earthquakes by using CFRP. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 28(4): 878—889. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2020.04.011

许成祥, 王粘锦, 2021. 双层高架桥框架式桥墩地震损伤试验. 土木工程与管理学报, 38（5）: 49—56 doi: 10.13579/j.cnki.2095-0985.2021.05.008

Xu C. X. , Wang Z. J. , 2021. Experimental on seismic damage of frame piers of double-deck viaduct. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 38(5): 49—56. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13579/j.cnki.2095-0985.2021.05.008

张洁, 李建中, 管仲国, 2012. 双层高架桥拟静力试验研究. 结构工程师, 28（6）: 128—133 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0159.2012.06.023

Zhang J. , Li J. Z. , Guan Z. G. , 2012. Pseudo-static test study on double-deck viaducts. Structural Engineers, 28(6): 128—133. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0159.2012.06.023

张洁, 管仲国, 李建中, 2017. 双层高架桥梁框架墩抗震性能试验研究. 工程力学, 34（2）: 120—128 doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.07.0557

Zhang J. , Guan Z. G. , Li J. Z. , 2017. Experimental research on seismic peformance of frame piers of double-deck viaducts. Engineering Mechanics, 34(2): 120—128. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.07.0557

中华人民共和国交通运输部, 2020. JTG/T 2231-01—2020 公路桥梁抗震设计规范. 北京: 人民交通出版社.

Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, 2020. JTG/T 2231-01—2020 Specifications for seismic design of highway bridges. Beijing: China Communications Press. (in Chinese)

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 2012. CJJ 166—2011 城市桥梁抗震设计规范. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2012. CJJ 166—2011 Code for seismic design of urban bridges. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)

钟菊芳, 胡晓, 易立新等, 2006. 最大峰值加速度与有效峰值加速度的大小比例关系及影响因素探讨. 世界地震工程, 22（2）: 34—38 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6069.2006.02.007

Zhong J. F. , Hu X. , Yi L. X. , et al. , 2006. Study on relations of effective peak acceleration and peak ground acceleration. World Earthquake Engineering, 22(2): 34—38. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6069.2006.02.007

周旺旺, 刘德稳, 赵洁等, 2022. 考虑土-结构作用的层间隔震结构三维地震响应. 科学技术与工程, 22（6）: 2394—2400 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.06.032

Zhou W. W. , Liu D. W. , Zhao J. , et al. , 2022. Effect of soil-structure layer isolation structural three-dimensional seismic response. Science Technology and Engineering, 22(6): 2394—2400. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.06.032

卓卫东, 曾武华, 2015. 矩形RC桥墩变形能力概率模型. 工程力学, 32（1）: 57—63, 71

Zhuo W. D. , Zeng W. H. , 2015. Probabilistic deformation capacity model for rectangular RC bridge columns. Engineering Mechanics, 32(1): 57—63, 71. (in Chinese)

Chai Y. H. , 1996. An analysis of the seismic characteristics of steel-jacketed circular bridge columns. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 25(2): 149—161.

Deng J. , Liu T. H. , Xie W. Z. , et al. , 2015. Study on repaired earthquake-damaged bridge piers under seismic load. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015: 295392.

He R. L. , Sneed L. H. , Belarbi A. , 2013. Rapid repair of severely damaged RC columns with different damage conditions: an experimental study. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 7(1): 35—50. doi: 10.1007/s40069-013-0030-7

He R. L. , Yang Y. , Sneed L. H. , 2015. Seismic repair of reinforced concrete bridge columns: review of research findings. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 20(15): 04015015.

Hose Y. , Silva P. , Seible F. , 2000. Development of a performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components and systems under simulated seismic loads. Earthquake Spectra, 16(2): 413—442. doi: 10.1193/1.1586119

Khan Q. U. Z. , Ahmad A. , Mehboob S. , et al. , 2021. Energy dissipation characteristics of retrofitted damaged low-strength concrete bridge pier. Bridge Engineering, 174(2): 148—156.

Montuori R. , Piluso V. , 2009. Reinforced concrete columns strengthened with angles and battens subjected to eccentric load. Engineering Structures, 31(2): 539—550. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.10.005

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计