2016年唐山开平<i>M</i><sub>L</sub>4.7地震活动性分析

张盛中; 王同利; 崔博闻; 乔永军; 马胜男

doi:10.11899/zzfy20230313

2016年唐山开平M_L4.7地震活动性分析

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20230313

1.
中国地质大学（北京）, 信息网络与数据中心, 北京 100083
2.
北京市地震局, 北京 100081
3.
中国地质大学（北京）, 地球物理与信息技术学院, 北京 100083

基金项目: 北京市自然基金项目（XH21001）

详细信息

作者简介:
张盛中，男，生于1973年。硕士，工程师。从事地震工程和网络安全工作。E-mail：zhsz@cugb.edu.cn

通讯作者:
王同利，女，生于1973年。硕士，正研级高级工程师。主要从事地震活动性和地震监测、预报研究工作。E-mail：416991552@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 46
- HTML全文浏览量: 11
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-06-21
- 刊出日期: 2023-08-31

Seismic Activity Analysis of M_L4.7 in Kaiping, Tangshan in 2016

1.
Information Network and Data Center, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Beijing Seismological Bureau, Beijing 100081, China
3.
School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 2016年8月至2016年10月唐山余震区小震活动增强，尤其是8月21日至9月22日期间，其中9月10日发生震级最大地震为唐山开平M_L4.7地震。为了解中强地震发震特征及地震序列变化，基于模板匹配定位识别技术，利用2016年8月1日至2016年10月31日连续波形进行唐山开平地震前后微震检测和定位。从研究区域内中国地震台网目录中选择283个地震事件作为模板事件，基于连续波形共检测识别出878个地震事件，其数量约为模板事件的3倍，约为中国地震台网目录的1.4倍，检测后的地震目录完备震级由原来的M_L0.2 提升至M_L−0.1。利用双差定位方法对847个地震事件进行重定位，结果显示震中附近小震活动频繁，且在唐山开平地震震中周边分布较集中。分析震群分布特征认为唐山开平地震属于唐山老震区正常地震活动，发震断层为唐山-古冶断裂的可能性较大。
- 地震活动 /
- 模板匹配 /
- 检测 /
- 定位 /
- 完备震级
Abstract: From August to October, 2016, small seismic activity increased in Tangshan, especially from August 21 to September 22, The largest earthquake was a magnitude of M_L4.7 seismic in Kaiping on September 10. In this paper, based on the continuous seismic data between August 1, 2016 and October 31, 2016 recorded by 37 seismic stations, we utilize the graphics processing unit based match & locate technology (be called GPU M&L) and double difference location algorithm methods(be called HypoDD) to study the microseismical sequence of the Kaiping M_L4.7. Firstly, 283 seismic were selected as template from those seismic events provided by the China Earthquake Network Center. Secondly, we detected the 878 seismic events with GPU M&L, which are 3 times more than the template and 1.4 times more than the recorded by the China Earthquake Network Center, the complete magnitude of the seismic catalog decreases from M_L0.2 of the network catalog to M_L−0.1. Finally, 847 seismic events were accurately relocated using HypoDD, showing the activity of small seismic near the epicenter more strongly and the distribution more concentrated. According to the distribution of seismic groups, the Kaiping M_L4.7 belongs to the normal seismic activity in the Tangshan and the seismogenic fault is the Tangshan- Guye fault.
- Seismic activity /
- Template matching /
- Detection /
- Locate technology /
- Complete magnitude

HTML全文

图 1 地震周边构造背景及观测站（点）分布

Figure 1. Geological structure surrounding the epicenter and distribution of observation point

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 研究区域2016年8月至2016年10月台网地震目录序列与空间分布

Figure 2. Sequence and spatial distribution of network catalog from August to October 2016

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 检测地震目录数量-震级分析

Figure 3. The magnitude-number of catalogs after detection

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 台网目录和检测地震目录b值拟合分析

Figure 4. Statistical catalogs analysis of b value between the network and the detection

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 重定位后地震事件分布

Figure 5. Distribution of detection earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 检测地震事件震源空间分布

Figure 6. Source spatial distribution of detection seismic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 检测地震事件时序分布

Figure 7. Time serials distribution of detection seismic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(25)

房立华, 吴建平, 王未来等, 2013. 四川芦山M_S7.0级地震及其余震序列重定位. 科学通报, 58（20）: 1901—1909.

Fang L. H. , Wu J. P. , Wang W. L. , et al. , 2013. Relocation of the mainshock and aftershock sequences of M_S7.0 Sichuan Lushan earthquake. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(28): 3451—3459.

国家地震局《一九七六年唐山地震》编辑组, 1982. 一九七六年唐山地震. 北京: 地震出版社.

虢顺民, 李志义, 程绍平等, 1977. 唐山地震区域构造背景和发震模式的讨论. 地质科学, 12（4）: 305—321

Guo S. M. , Li Z. Y. , Cheng S. P. , et al. , 1977. Discussion: on the recional structural background and the seismogenic model of the Tangshan earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geology, 12(4): 305—321. (in Chinese)

黄德瑜, 冯浩, 1981. 强震前大范围地震活动性参数的时空扫描. 地震学报, 3（3）: 283—291

Huang D. Y. , Feng H. , 1981. Time and space scanning of parameters of seismicity over a broad region before strong earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 3(3): 283—291. (in Chinese)

黄玮琼, 时振梁, 曹学锋, 1989. b值统计中的影响因素及危险性分析中b值的选取. 地震学报, 11（4）: 351—361

Huang W. Q. , Shi Z. L. , Cao X. F. , 1989. Factors influencing the estimation of b value and the selection of b value in hazard analysis. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(4): 351—361. (in Chinese)

梁姗姗, 雷建设, 徐志国等, 2017.2016年1月21日青海门源M_S6.4余震序列重定位和主震震源机制解. 地球物理学报, 60（6）: 2091—2103 doi: 10.6038/cjg20170606

Liang S. S. , Lei J. S. , Xu Z. G. , et al. , 2017. Relocation of the aftershock sequence and focal mechanism solutions of the 21 January 2016 Menyuan, Qinghai, M_S6.4 earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(6): 2091—2103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6038/cjg20170606

廖诗荣, 杨婷, 张红才等, 2021.2021年云南双柏M_S5.1地震序列的快速检测与精定位研究. 地震研究, 44（4）: 515—520

Liao S. R. , Yang T. , Zhang H. C. , et al. , 2021. Fast detection and relocation of the 2021 Shuangbai M_S5.1 earthquake sequences in Yunnan. Journal of Seismological Research, 44(4): 515—520. (in Chinese)

马鸿庆, 1978. 华北地区几次大震前的b值异常变化. 地球物理学报, 21（2）: 126—141

Ma H. Q. , 1978. Variations of the b-values before several large earthquakes occurred in North China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 21(2): 126—141. (in Chinese)

任雪梅, 2011. 地震区划中b值统计的若干问题研究. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所.

Ren X. M., 2011. Study on the estimation of b value on seismic zontion. Beijing: Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration. (in Chinese)

谭毅培, 邓莉, 曹井泉等, 2016.2015年河北滦县震群发震机理分析. 地球物理学报, 59（11）: 4113—4125 doi: 10.6038/cjg20161115

Tan Y. P. , Deng L. , Cao J. Q. , 2016. Seismological mechanism analysis of 2015 Luanxian swarm, Hebei province. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 59(11): 4113—4125. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6038/cjg20161115

王同利, 刘敏, 李红谊等, 2019. 阿拉善左旗M_S5.8地震前后地震活动性分析和重定位. 地球物理学报, 62（6）: 2038—2047 doi: 10.6038/cjg2019N0024

Wang T. L. , Liu M. , Li H. Y. , et al. , 2019. Relocation of the aftershock sequence and activity of the M_S5.8 Alxa earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(6): 2038—2047. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6038/cjg2019N0024

王未来, 吴建平, 房立华等, 2014.2014年云南鲁甸M_S6.5地震序列的双差定位. 地球物理学报, 57（9）: 3042—3051 doi: 10.6038/cjg20140929

Wang W. L. , Wu J. P. , Fang L. H. , et al. , 2014. Double difference location of the Ludian M_S6.5 earthquake sequences in Yunnan province in 2014. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(9): 3042—3051. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6038/cjg20140929

杨智娴, 陈运泰, 郑月军等, 2003. 双差地震定位法在我国中西部地区地震精确定位中的应用. 中国科学（D辑）: 地球科学, 33（S1）: 129—134.

Yang Z. X., Chen Y. T., Zheng Y. J., et al., 2003. Accurate relocation of earthquakes in central-western China using the double-difference earthquake location algorithm. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 46（2）: 181—188. (in Chinese)

张雅楠, 李红谊, 张盛中等, 2023. 上海及邻区微震检测与定位. 地球物理学报, 66（3）: 1113—1124 doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0915

Zhang Y. N. , Li H. Y. , Zhang S. Z. , et al. , 2023. Microseismic detection and location in Shanghai and its adjacent areas. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 66(3): 1113—1124. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0915

朱艾斓, 徐锡伟, 周永胜等, 2005. 川西地区小震重新定位及其活动构造意义. 地球物理学报, 48（3）: 629—636 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2005.03.021

Zhu A. L. , Xu X. W. , Zhou Y. S. , et al. , 2005. Relocation of small earthquakes in western Sichuan, China and its implications for active tectonics. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(3): 629—636. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2005.03.021

Crotwell H. P. , Owens T. J. , Ritsema J. , 1999. The TauP Toolkit: Flexible seismic travel-time and ray-path utilities. Seismological Research Letters, 70(2): 154—160. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.70.2.154

Felzer K. R. , Abercrombie R. E. , Ekström G. , 2004. A common origin for aftershocks, foreshocks, and multiplets. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94(1): 88—98. doi: 10.1785/0120030069

Gutenberg B., Richter C. F., 1954. Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 16—21.

Hauksson E. , Shearer P. , 2005. Southern California hypocenter relocation with waveform cross-correlation, Part 1: results using the double-difference method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(3): 896—903. doi: 10.1785/0120040167

Helmstetter A. , Sornette D. , 2003 a. Foreshocks explained by cascades of triggered seismicity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B10): 2457.

Helmstetter A. , Sornette D. , Grasso J. R. , 2003 b. Mainshocks are aftershocks of conditional foreshocks: How do foreshock statistical properties emerge from aftershock laws. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B1): 2046.

Liu M. , Li H. Y. , Zhang M. , et al. , 2020. Graphics processing unit-based match and locate (GPU-M&L): An improved match and locate method and its application. Seismological Research Letters, 91(2 A): 1019—1029. doi: 10.1785/0220190241

Rydelek P. A. , Sacks I. S. , 1989. Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogues and the hypothesis of self-similarity. Nature, 337(6204): 251—253. doi: 10.1038/337251a0

Vidale J. E. , Shearer P. M. , 2006. A survey of 71 earthquake bursts across southern California: Exploring the role of pore fluid pressure fluctuations and aseismic slip as drivers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B5): B05312.

Zhang M. , Wen L. X. , 2015. An effective method for small event detection: match and locate (M&L). Geophysical Journal International, 200(3): 1523—1537. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu466

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计