芦山6.1级地震与泸县6.0级地震人员伤亡对比分析

代友林; 刘洋; 梁远玲; 肖本夫; 杨璐遥

doi:10.11899/zzfy20220407

芦山6.1级地震与泸县6.0级地震人员伤亡对比分析

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20220407

四川省地震局, 成都 610041

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目（2019YFC1509402）

详细信息

作者简介:
代友林，男，生于1993年。硕士研究生，助理工程师。主要从事地震应急工作。E-mail：948222920@qq.com

2 宝兴县应急管理局，2022. 宝兴地震突发公共事件伤（病）情信息统计报告表.
计量
- 文章访问数: 156
- HTML全文浏览量: 17
- PDF下载量: 31
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-11
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-31

Comparative Analysis of Casualties between Lushan M6.1 Earthquake and Luxian M6.0 Earthquake

Sichuan Earthquake Agency, Chengdu 610041, China

摘要

摘要: 本文根据芦山6.1级地震及泸县6.0级地震现场调查资料，对比分析2次地震伤亡人员的空间分布及伤亡原因，得出避震不当是造成2次地震人员伤亡的重要因素之一。其中，芦山6.1级地震重伤及遇难人员多集中在Ⅶ度区，多数因次生地质灾害躲避不当致伤；泸县6.0级地震伤亡人员数量与地震烈度呈现正相关性，重伤及遇难人员均因房屋及其附属构件震损致伤。根据分析结果，从科普宣传、房屋及其附属构件抗震设防、次生地质灾害防治方面提出建议，为当地防震减灾提供参考。
- 人员伤亡 /
- 芦山6.1级地震 /
- 泸县6.0级地震
Abstract: According to the on-site investigation data of the Lushan M6.1 earthquake and the Luxian M6.0 earthquake, the spatial distribution of casualties and the causes of casualties in the two earthquakes were compared and analyzed, and it was concluded that unreasonable aviodance was one of the important factors for casualties in the two earthquakes. Among them, most of the seriously injured and dead people in the Lushan M6.1 earthquake were concentrated in intensity VII area, and most of them were injured due to improper avoidance of secondary geological disasters. The victims were injured due to the earthquake damage to the house and its ancillary components. According to the analysis results, suggestions are put forward from the aspects of popular science propaganda, seismic fortification of houses and their ancillary components, and prevention of secondary geological disasters, so as to provide reference for local earthquake prevention and disaster reduction.
- Casualties /
- Lushan M6.1 earthquake /
- Luxian M6.0 earthquake
注释:

1) 2 宝兴县应急管理局，2022. 宝兴地震突发公共事件伤（病）情信息统计报告表.

HTML全文

图 1 泸县6.0级地震烈度范围

Figure 1. The intensity range of the Luxian M6.0 earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 芦山6.1级地震烈度范围

Figure 2. The intensity range of the Lushan M6.1 earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 2次地震伤亡人员在各烈度区的占比情况

Figure 3. The proportion of casualties in the two earthquakes in each intensity area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 2次地震不同伤情人员在各烈度区的分布情况

Figure 4. The distribution of different injuries in the intensity areas of the two earthquakes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 泸县6.0级地震重伤及以上伤情人员分布图

Figure 5. Distribution map of people seriously injured and above in the Luxian M6.0 earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 芦山6.1级地震重伤及以上伤情人员分布图

Figure 6. Distribution map of people seriously injured and above in the Lushan M6.1 earthquake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 2次地震各类伤亡原因占比情况

Figure 7. The proportion of various casualties in the two earthquakes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 2次地震Ⅵ度及以上各烈度影响范围对比

Table 1. The comparison table of the influence scope of the two earthquakes of degree VI and above

地震名	影响范围/km²
地震名	Ⅵ度区面积	Ⅶ度区面积	Ⅷ度区面积	Ⅵ度及以上区域面积
芦山6.1级地震	2777	979	131	3887
泸县6.0级地震	2170	340	103	2613

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 伤情程度分类

Table 2. Classification of injury severity

伤情程度	伤情描述
死亡（遇难）	心跳、呼吸完全停止，各种反射消失的临床死亡。
危重	生命体征极不稳定；一个以上的器官系统急性功能障碍或衰竭；随时可能危及生命；下达病危；紧急干预后无改善或预后不良。
重度	生命体征不平稳，有进一步加重趋势，需要立即进行医疗干预，但当前尚未达到“危重”程度的。
中度	生命体征暂时稳定，需住院医疗干预，有可能出现病情加重，但暂不危及生命的。
轻度	生命体征稳定，仅需门、急诊处置或留院观察的。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2次地震各类伤亡原因人数统计表

Table 3. Statistical table of the number of casualties caused by the two earthquakes

伤情	避震不当致伤/人		因房屋及其附属构件震损致伤/人		次生地质灾害致伤/人		其他偶然原因/人
伤情	芦山	泸县	芦山	泸县	芦山	泸县	芦山	泸县
遇难	0	0	0	3	4	0	0	0
危重	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
重度	0	1	1	2	2	0	0	0
中度	0	3	0	1	1	0	0	0
轻度	22	37	3	11	10	0	2	0
合计	22	41	4	17	18	0	2	0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

白仙富, 聂高众, 戴雨芡等, 2021. 基于公里网格单元的地震滑坡人员死亡率评估模型——以2014年鲁甸M_S6.5地震为例. 地震研究, 44（1）: 87—95 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2021.01.012

Bai X. F. , Nie G. Z. , Dai Y. Q. , et al. , 2021. Modeling and testing earthquake-induced landslide casualty rate based on a grid in a kilometer scale: taking the 2014 Yunnan Ludian M_S6.5 Earthquake as a case. Journal of Seismological Research, 44(1): 87—95. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2021.01.012

杜方, 2020.2019年地震活动综述. 四川地震, （1）: 1—5 doi: 10.13716/j.cnki.1001-8115.2020.01.001

Du F. , 2020. Summary of earthquake activities in 2019. Earthquake Research in Sichuan, (1): 1—5. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13716/j.cnki.1001-8115.2020.01.001

李宁, 李岩峰, 李妍, 2013. “4·20”芦山地震高伤亡比例原因初探. 城市与减灾, （6）: 17—19 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2013.06.005

Li N. , Li Y. F. , Li Y. , 2013. First exploration on high death rate during Lushan Earthquake, occurred on April 20, 2013. City and Disaster Reduction, (6): 17—19. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0495.2013.06.005

李媛媛, 苏国峰, 翁文国等, 2014. 地震人员伤亡评估方法研究. 灾害学, 29（2）: 223—227

Li Y. Y. , Su G. F. , Weng W. G. , et al. , 2014. A review of researches on seismic casualty estimation. Journal of Catastrophology, 29(2): 223—227. (in Chinese)

南燕云, 刘亢, 高博伟等, 2021.2011—2020年中国大陆地震人员伤亡基本特征分析. 灾害学, 36（4）: 42—47 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2021.04.008

Nan Y. Y. , Liu K. , Gao B. W. , et al. , 2021. Characteristic analysis of earthquake-caused casualties in China’s mainland in 2011-2020. Journal of Catastrophology, 36(4): 42—47. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2021.04.008

聂高众, 夏朝旭, 范熙伟等, 2021. 基于历史地震数据的建筑物致死性水平研究. 地质科学, 56（4）: 1250—1266 doi: 10.12017/dzkx.2021.068

Nie G. Z. , Xia C. X. , Fan X. W. , et al. , 2021. Research on the lethal level of buildings based on historical seismic data. Chinese Journal of Geology, 56(4): 1250—1266. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12017/dzkx.2021.068

王波, 郭迅, 宣越, 2020. 基于新视角的震害分析——以四川长宁6.0级地震为例. 震灾防御技术, 15（3）: 496—509 doi: 10.11899/zzfy20200303

Wang B. , Guo X. , Xuan Y. , 2020. Analysis of earthquake damage from a new perspective: a case study of Changning M6.0 Earthquake in Sichuan province. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 15(3): 496—509. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/zzfy20200303

魏本勇, 聂高众, 苏桂武等, 2017. 地震灾害埋压人员评估的研究进展. 灾害学, 32（1）: 155—159 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2017.01.027

Wei B. Y. , Nie G. Z. , Su G. W. , et al. , 2017. Advances on the assessment methods of buried personnel distribution in earthquake disaster. Journal of Catastrophology, 32(1): 155—159. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2017.01.027

吴微微, 2013. 从汶川和芦山地震浅析四川地震次生地质灾害的特点及减灾对策. 震灾防御技术, 8（4）: 434—439 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2013.04.011

Wu W. W. , 2013. Characteristics and countermeasures of geological hazards induced in Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes, Sichuan province. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 8(4): 434—439. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2013.04.011

肖本夫, 申源, 陈维锋等, 2020. 基于MINA框架的应急救助与地震灾情管理平台设计与实现. 震灾防御技术, 15（4）: 836—845 doi: 10.11899/zzfy20200418

Xiao B. F. , Shen Y. , Chen W. F. , et al. , 2020. Design and implementation of management platform of emergency assistance and seismic disaster based on the MINA framework. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 15(4): 836—845. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/zzfy20200418

宴金旭, 叶肇恒, 郑逸等, 2020. 四川荣县M_S4.7、M_S 4.3、M_S 4.9地震房屋震害特征和人员伤亡分析. 地震工程学报, 42（4）: 1019—1023, 1034

Yan J. X. , Ye Z. H. , Zheng Y. , et al. , 2020. Investigation of building damage characteristics and human casualties in relation to theM_S 4.7, M_S 4.3, andM_S 4.9 earthquakes occurring in Rong County, Sichuan province. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 42(4): 1019—1023, 1034. (in Chinese)

闫佳琦, 陈相兆, 孙柏涛, 2021. 地震人员伤亡评估方法及损失评估系统综述. 工程力学, 38（12）: 1—16 doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.11.0861

Yan J. Q. , Chen X. Z. , Sun B. T. , 2021. Review of estimation methods and systems used to predict earthquake casualties. Engineering Mechanics, 38(12): 1—16. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.11.0861

张凌, 谭璇, 宋冬梅等, 2019. 基于马尔科夫随机场的单时相震害影像受损建筑物识别方法. 地震地质, 41（5）: 1273—1288 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.05.014

Zhang L. , Tan X. , Song D. M. , et al. , 2019. Study on the MRF-based method for damaged buildings extraction from the single-phase seismic image. Seismology and Geology, 41(5): 1273—1288. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.05.014

郑山锁, 张睿明, 陈飞等, 2019. 地震人员伤亡评估理论及应用研究. 世界地震工程, 35（1）: 87—96

Zheng S. S. , Zhang R. M. , Chen F. , et al. , 2019. Research on theory and application of earthquake casualty estimates. World Earthquake Engineering, 35(1): 87—96. (in Chinese)

中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2016. GB 18306—2015 中国地震动参数区划图. 北京: 中国标准出版社.

General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, China National Standardization Administration Committee, 2016. GB 18306—2015 Seismic ground motion parameters zonation map of China. Beijing: Standards Press of China. (in Chinese)

中华人民共和国卫生部, 2006. 国家突发公共事件医疗卫生救援应急预案. 中国食品卫生杂志, 18（4）: 373—378.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2010. GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, 2010. GB 50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计