Analysis on Dynamic Interaction of Subway Station-soil-aboveground Frame Structure Under Inclined Incidence of SV Wave
-
摘要: 地震作用下地铁车站和邻近建筑间的动力相互作用问题已引起许多学者的关注和重视，然而斜入射地震波作用下的相互作用分析研究较少，有关规律仍不明确。为此建立基于黏弹性人工边界的地铁车站-土-地表框架结构整体动力分析有限元模型，围绕入射角、地上与地下结构间距、场地类别等因素，采用频域刚度矩阵自由场地震响应分析方法获得任意角度斜入射SV波作用下地铁车站-土-地表框架结构动力响应规律。研究结果表明，地表框架结构的存在会显著增大车站中柱轴力幅值，当地表框架结构与车站紧邻时，中柱轴力放大幅度最大为730%，放大效应会改变轴力随入射角的变化规律，总体上使车站中柱轴力在SV波垂直入射和超临界角10°左右入射时均具有相当的幅值；地表框架结构对地铁车站层间位移角的影响与场地条件密切相关，在较硬的场地（Ⅱ类场地）中，车站层间位移角放大幅度最大为74%，在较软的场地（Ⅳ类场地）中，车站层间位移角缩小幅度最大为30%；地铁车站的存在对地表框架结构层间位移角具有放大作用，总体上地铁车站与地表框架结构的距离越近，放大作用越明显，地表框架结构层间位移角放大幅度最大为52%。建议将0°入射和超临界角10°左右入射工况作为地上或地下结构地震响应分析的不利工况。Abstract: Dynamic interaction between subway station structure and adjacent building under the action of earthquake has been given much attention. However, the analysis of interaction under oblique incident seismic wave is still lacking, and the relevant laws are not clear. In this paper, based on viscoelastic artificial boundary, finite element model of the whole dynamic system of subway station-soil-aboveground frame structure is established, free field seismic response analysis method by means of the frequency domain stiffness matrix is adopted to obtain the seismic input under the action of oblique incident SV wave at any angle, and dynamic response law of the subway station-soil-aboveground frame structure system is analyzed by taking the incidence angle, the space between the aboveground and underground structures, the site category into account. It is found that: (1) The existence of aboveground structure will significantly increase the axial force amplitude of central column of station structure, when the aboveground frame structure is close to the station structure, axial force amplitude of the central column can be increased by up to 7.3 times, and this increase effect will change the variation law of the axial force amplitude with the incident angle, generally, the axial force of central column of the station has a considerable amplitude when SV wave is vertically incident and when it is about 10° higher than the critical angle. (2) The influence of the aboveground frame structure on the story drift ratio of subway station is closely related to the site conditions, in hard site (class Ⅱ site), the story drift ratio of station is amplified by 74% at the highest, and in soft site (class Ⅳ site), the story drift ratio of station is reduced by 30% at the lowest. (3) The existence of subway station structure can amplify the story drift ratio of aboveground frame structure, generally, the closer the subway station is to the aboveground building, the more obvious the amplification effect is, and the story drift ratio of aboveground frame structure can be amplified by 52% at most. It is suggested that cases of 0° incidence and the supercritical angle incidence, which is about 10° higher than the critical angle, should be considered as the unfavorable condition for seismic response analysis of aboveground or underground structures.
-
图 5 自由场地表中点加速度峰值随入射角变化曲线
Figure 5. Curve of peak acceleration of midpoint on the surface of free field varying with incident angle
图 6 Ⅱ类场地中地铁车站内力幅值随入射角变化曲线
Figure 6. Amplitudes of internal forces of subway station varying with incident angles in class Ⅱ site
图 7 Ⅲ类场地中地铁车站内力幅值随入射角变化曲线
Figure 7. Amplitudes of internal forces of subway station varying with incident angles in class Ⅲ site
图 8 Ⅳ类场地中地铁车站内力幅值随入射角变化曲线
Figure 8. Amplitudes of internal forces of subway station varying with incident angles in class Ⅳ site
图 9 El Centro波作用下车站层间位移角随入射角变化曲线
Figure 9. Variation curves of story drift ratio versus incident angle under El Centro wave
图 10 Kobe波作用下车站层间位移角随入射角变化曲线
Figure 10. Variation curves of story drift ratio versus incident angle under Kobe wave
-
杜修力, 赵密, 王进廷, 2006. 近场波动模拟的人工应力边界条件. 力学学报, 38（1）: 49—56 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2006.01.007Du X. L. , Zhao M. , Wang J. T. , 2006. A stress artificial boundary in FEA for near-field wave problem. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 38(1): 49—56. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2006.01.007 黄景琦, 杜修力, 田志敏等, 2014. 斜入射SV波对地铁车站地震响应的影响. 工程力学, 31（9）: 81—88, 103 doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.03.0278Huang J. Q. , Du X. L. , Tian Z. M. , et al. , 2014. Effect of the oblique incidence of seismic SV waves on the seismic response of subway station structure. Engineering Mechanics, 31(9): 81—88, 103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.03.0278 李延涛, 田野, 宗金辉等, 2020. 受相邻上部结构影响的隧道-土体系振动台试验研究. 振动与冲击, 39（3）: 233—241, 259Li Y. T. , Tian Y. , Zong J. H. , et al. , 2020. Shaking-table tests for seismic response of tunnel-soil system affected by adjacent upper structure. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 39(3): 233—241, 259. (in Chinese) 刘晶波, 吕彦东, 1998. 结构-地基动力相互作用问题分析的一种直接方法. 土木工程学报, 31（3）: 55—64Liu J. B. , Lv Y. D. , 1998. A direct method for analysis of dynamic soil-structure interaction. China Civil Engineering Journal, 31(3): 55—64. (in Chinese) 刘晶波, 杜义欣, 闫秋实, 2007. 粘弹性人工边界及地震动输入在通用有限元软件中的实现. 见: 中国土木工程学会. 第三届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会论文集. 南京: 《防灾减灾工程学报》编辑部, 43—48. 邱滟佳, 张鸿儒, 于仲洋, 2021. 受周边地上建筑影响地铁车站的抗震设计方法. 岩土力学, 42（5）: 1443—1452Qiu Y. J. , Zhang H. R. , Yu Z. Y. , 2021. A seismic design method of subway stations affected by surrounding buildings. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 42(5): 1443—1452. (in Chinese) 王国波, 于艳丽, 何卫, 2014. 下穿隧道-土-地表邻近框架结构相互作用体系地震响应初步分析. 岩土工程学报, 36（2）: 334—338 doi: 10.11779/CJGE201402010Wang G. B. , Yu Y. L. , He W. , 2014. Seismic response of interaction system of underlying tunnels, soils and adjacent frame structures. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 36(2): 334—338. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201402010 王国波, 王亚西, 陈斌等, 2015. 隧道-土体-地表结构相互作用体系地震响应影响因素分析. 岩石力学与工程学报, 34（6）: 1276—1287Wang G. B. , Wang Y. X. , Chen B. , et al. , 2015. Analysis of factors influencing seismic responses of tunnel-soil-ground structural system. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 34(6): 1276—1287. (in Chinese) 王国波, 巴峰, 王垚等, 2022. 考虑场地-城市效应的复杂相互作用体系地震响应研究进展. 自然灾害学报, 31（3）: 1—14 doi: 10.13577/j.jnd.2022.0301Wang G. B. , Ba F. , Wang Y. , et al. , 2022. Research progress on seismic response of complex interaction system considering site-city effect. Journal of Natural Disasters, 31(3): 1—14. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13577/j.jnd.2022.0301 张季, 谭灿星, 黄源等, 2020. 地震作用下软土-隧道-地上框架体系动力反应分析. 振动与冲击, 39（22）: 278—286Zhang J. , Tan C. X. , Huang Y. , et al. , 2020. Dynamic response analyses of soft soil-tunnel-aboveground frame systems under earthquake. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 39(22): 278—286. (in Chinese) 张季, 谭灿星, 许开成, 2021 a. 地震作用下软土-隧道-地上框架体系非线性动力反应分析. 振动与冲击, 40（12）: 159—167Zhang J. , Tan C. X. , Xu K. C. , 2021 a. Nonlinear dynamic response analyses of a soft soil-tunnel-aboveground frame structure system under earthquake. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 40(12): 159—167. (in Chinese) 张季, 谭灿星, 叶国涛等, 2021 b. SV波超临界角斜入射时层状地基地震动输入在ABAQUS中的实现. 工程力学, 38（4）: 200—210Zhang J. , Tan C. X. , Ye G. T. , et al. , 2021 b. Realization of ground motion input in ABAQUS for layered foundation under SV wave of oblique incidence over critical angle. Engineering Mechanics, 38(4): 200—210. (in Chinese) 庄海洋, 任佳伟, 王瑞等, 2019. 两层三跨框架式地铁地下车站结构弹塑性工作状态与抗震性能水平研究. 岩土工程学报, 41（1）: 131—138Zhuang H. Y. , Ren J. W. , Wang R. , et al. , 2019. Elasto-plastic working states and seismic performance levels of frame-type subway underground station with two layers and three spans. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 41(1): 131—138. (in Chinese) 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2010. GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, 2010. GB 50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese) Jin L. G. , Zhu J. , Zhou W. , et al. , 2022. 2 D dynamic tunnel-soil-aboveground building interaction I: analytical solution for incident plane SH-waves based on rigid tunnel and foundation model. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 128: 104625. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104625 Pitilakis K. , Tsinidis G. , Leanza A. , et al. , 2014. Seismic behaviour of circular tunnels accounting for above ground structures interaction effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 67: 1—15. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.009 Wang G. B. , Yuan M. Z. , Miao Y. , et al. , 2018. Experimental study on seismic response of underground tunnel-soil-surface structure interaction system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 76: 145—159. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.015 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(11)
计量
- 文章访问数: 176
- HTML全文浏览量: 61
- PDF下载量: 26
- 被引次数: 0
