• ISSN 1673-5722
  • CN 11-5429/P

考虑介质对地震波吸收衰减作用的场地放大效应估计

李启成 张尉 郑新娟 席桂梅 贺翔 肖燕妃 王明成 陈红臻

李启成,张尉,郑新娟,席桂梅,贺翔,肖燕妃,王明成,陈红臻,2021. 考虑介质对地震波吸收衰减作用的场地放大效应估计. 震灾防御技术,16(3):476−484. doi:10.11899/zzfy20210306. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210306
引用本文: 李启成,张尉,郑新娟,席桂梅,贺翔,肖燕妃,王明成,陈红臻,2021. 考虑介质对地震波吸收衰减作用的场地放大效应估计. 震灾防御技术,16(3):476−484. doi:10.11899/zzfy20210306. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210306
Li Qicheng, Zhang Wei, Zheng Xinjuan, Xi Guimei, He Xiang, Xiao Yanfei, Wang Mingcheng, Chen Hongzhen. Estimation of Site Amplification Effect Considering the Absorption and Attenuation of Seismic Waves by the Medium[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2021, 16(3): 476-484. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210306
Citation: Li Qicheng, Zhang Wei, Zheng Xinjuan, Xi Guimei, He Xiang, Xiao Yanfei, Wang Mingcheng, Chen Hongzhen. Estimation of Site Amplification Effect Considering the Absorption and Attenuation of Seismic Waves by the Medium[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2021, 16(3): 476-484. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210306

考虑介质对地震波吸收衰减作用的场地放大效应估计

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210306
基金项目: 辽宁省教育厅项目(551610001219);辽宁省重点研发计划指导计划(2019000901)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李启成,男,生于1963年。博士,副教授。主要从事地震工程学研究。E-mail:731732866@qq.com

Estimation of Site Amplification Effect Considering the Absorption and Attenuation of Seismic Waves by the Medium

  • 摘要: 当参考场地震源距小于研究场地震源距时,传统谱比法低估了场地放大效应,且参考场地与研究场地震源距相差越大,低估程度越大;当参考场地震源距大于研究场地震源距时,传统谱比法高估了场地放大效应,且参考场地与研究场地震源距相差越大,高估程度越大,计算结果依赖参考场地的选择。上述问题存在的原因是传统谱比法估计场地放大效应时未考虑地震波传播过程中介质的吸收衰减作用,故传统谱比法适用于参考场地与研究场地地质构造类似且震源距相差较小的情况,为此本文通过考虑介质对地震波的吸收衰减作用,提出改进谱比法,可适用于地质构造类似、任意震源距的情况。本文分别采用未改进方法和改进方法估计汶川地震中渭河盆地多个台站场地反应,证实了传统谱比法存在的上述问题。采用改进谱比法估计的场地放大倍数均在2 Hz以下出现1个峰值,且这些峰值多为最大值;采用未改进谱比法估计的场地放大倍数峰值出现的频率多大于2 Hz;改进谱比法可信度较高。
  • 图  1  渭河盆地地震台站分布

    Figure  1.  Seismic station distribution in Weihe basin

    图  2  汤峪台站和长安台站的场地放大效应

    Figure  2.  The site amplification effect of Tangyu station and Chang'an station

    图  3  韩城台站的场地放大效应

    Figure  3.  The site amplification effect of Hancheng station

    图  4  用传统谱比法和改进谱比法计算结果对比

    Figure  4.  The comparison of calculation results between the traditional spectral ratio method and improved spectral ratio method

    表  1  地震台站地区沉积物厚度

    Table  1.   Thickness of sediment at each station

    台站沉积物厚度/m台站 沉积物厚度/m台站沉积物厚度/m
    陇县千阳凤翔100
    陈仓200岐山100杨凌700
    汤峪0乾陵10户县800
    周至100咸阳600草滩700
    长安0西安1 200蓝田100
    泾阳600高陵800临潼870
    渭南1 325阎良400吝店600
    华县800蒲城200华阴800
    大荔700合阳100韩城
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  地震台站震源距

    Table  2.   Source distance of the station

    台站震源距/km 台站震源距/km台站震源距/km
    陈仓610千阳624凤翔624
    陇县632汤峪634周至646
    岐山647杨陵647户县670
    长安686乾陵694咸阳694
    西安701草滩715泾阳717
    临潼723蓝田723高陵734
    阎良754渭南762吝店767
    华县779蒲城799华阴808
    大荔814合阳861韩城900
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 李世峰, 金瞰昆, 周俊杰, 2008. 资源与工程地球物理勘探. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 114—115.
    [2] 彭建兵, 1992. 渭河断裂带的构造演化与地震活动. 地震地质, 14(2): 113—120.

    Peng J. B., 1992. Tectonic evolution and seismicity of Weihe fault zone. Seismology and Geology, 14(2): 113—120. (in Chinese)
    [3] 王海云, 2011. 渭河盆地中土层场地对地震动的放大作用. 地球物理学报, 54(1): 137—150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.01.015

    Wang H. Y., 2011. Amplification effects of soil sites on ground motion in the Weihe basin. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(1): 137—150. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.01.015
    [4] 章文波, 周雍年, 谢礼立, 2001. 场地放大效应的估计. 地震工程与工程振动, 21(4): 1—9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2001.04.001

    Zhang W. B., Zhou Y. N., Xie L. L., 2001. Estimation of absolute site amplification. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 21(4): 1—9. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2001.04.001
    [5] Andrews D. J., 1982. Separation of source and propagation spectra of Seven Mammoth Lakes aftershocks. In: Proceedings of workshop XVI. Dynamic Characteristics of Faulting Inferred from Recordings of Strong Ground Motion. Lake Tahoe: United States Geological Survey, 82—591.
    [6] Beresnev I. A., Atkinson G. M., 1998. Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 northridge, California, earthquake. I. Validation on rock sites. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88(6): 1392—1401.
    [7] Borcherdt R. D., 1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 60(1): 29—61.
    [8] Field E. H., Jacob K. H., 1995. A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85(4): 1127—1143.
    [9] Hanks T. C., Krawinkler H., 1991. The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake and its effects: Introduction to the special issue. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81(5): 1415—1423. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0810051415
    [10] Inagaki H., Iai S., Sugano T., et al., 1996. Performance of caisson type quay walls at Kobe port. Soils and Foundations, 36(S): 119—136.
    [11] Irikura K., 1983. Semi-empirical estimation of strong ground motions during large earthquakes. Bulletin of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto Univ, 33(2): 63-104.
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  100
  • HTML全文浏览量:  55
  • PDF下载量:  37
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-08-12
  • 刊出日期:  2021-09-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回