高强混凝土多重复合芯柱恢复力模型研究

邢国华; 王浩楠; 王溢菲; 马军; 国巍

doi:10.11899/zzfy20210211

高强混凝土多重复合芯柱恢复力模型研究

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210211

1.
长安大学建筑工程学院，西安 710061
2.
中南大学土木工程学院，长沙 410083

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（51868073）；陕西省技术创新引导专项基金（2019CGHJ-06）；中央高校科研业务费专项经费项目（300102288302）

详细信息

作者简介:
邢国华，男，生于1983年。博士，教授。主要从事工程结构抗震和耐久性方面的研究。E-mail：ghxing@chd.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 98
- HTML全文浏览量: 35
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-03
- 刊出日期: 2021-06-30

Study on Restoring Force Model of High-strength Concrete Columns Reinforced with Multiple Composite Central Reinforcements

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
2.
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

摘要

摘要: 基于8根高强混凝土多重复合芯柱在低周往复荷载作用下的试验结果，考虑轴压比、箍筋间距、配箍率等因素，提出骨架曲线特征点理论计算模型。同时，考虑加载历程对芯柱性能退化的影响，根据试验拟合结果引入刚度退化模型，以反映各试件滞回曲线卸载刚度退化规律，给出恢复力模型滞回规则，并将滞回曲线模拟值与试验值进行对比。结果表明：骨架曲线特征点计算方法具有较高精度，计算骨架曲线与试验测量骨架曲线吻合良好，可为高强混凝土多重复合芯柱非线性地震反应分析和工程设计提供参考。
- 芯柱 /
- 配箍形式 /
- 骨架曲线 /
- 抗震性能 /
- 恢复力模型
Abstract: Based on the quasi-static cyclic tests of eight high-strength concrete columns reinforced with multiple composite central reinforcements, a theoretical calculation model was presented to predict the characteristic points of skeleton curves for the columns considering influencing factors such as the axial compression ratio, stirrup spacing, and stirrup ratio. In addition, a restoring force model was introduced considering the degradation of unloading stiffness based on the fitted results of cyclic loading test data. The results show that the proposed model can accurately predict the characteristic points for these columns. The simulated hysteretic behaviors based on the restoring force model had good agreement with those from experimental results. Therefore, the proposed restoring force model can be applied for the nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures with such kinds of multiple reinforcement high-concrete columns.
- Core column /
- Stirrup form /
- Skeleton curve /
- Seismic behavior /
- Restoring force model

HTML全文

图 1 试件尺寸及配筋

Figure 1. Dimensions and reinforcement details of specimens

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 试验加载装置

Figure 2. Test loading devices

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 试件最终破坏形态

Figure 3. Final failure modes of specimens

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 实测骨架曲线

Figure 4. Measured skeleton curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 无量纲化骨架曲线

Figure 5. Dimensionless skeleton curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 三折线骨架曲线

Figure 6. Trilinear skeleton curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 定义屈服点（无量纲）

Figure 7. Definition of yielding point

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 截面区域划分

Figure 8. Partition in cross-section

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 截面屈服状态应变分布

Figure 9. Strain profiles of cross-section at yielding state

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 屈服荷载计算流程

Figure 10. Flowchart for calculation of yield loads

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 试验骨架曲线与计算骨架曲线比较

Figure 11. Comparison of skeleton curves from test and simulation results

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 卸载刚度拟合曲线

Figure 12. Fitted curve of unloading stiffness

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 恢复力模型

Figure 13. Restoring force model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 试验滞回曲线与计算滞回曲线比较

Figure 14. Comparison between test and calculation results of hysteretic curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 试件主要参数

Table 1. Main parameters of specimens

试件编号	外芯	内芯	内芯箍筋间距s/mm	纵筋配筋率ρ_l/%	体积配箍率ρ_w/%	轴力N_t/kN	试验轴压比n	柱高H/mm
CC	—	—	100	2.83	1.68	1 270	0.19	1 200
C-C-100	圆形	—	100	3.58	1.87	1 270	0.19	1 200
C-DC-100	圆形	圆形	100	3.90	1.96	1 270	0.19	1 200
C-DC-HA-100	圆形	圆形	100	3.90	1.96	3 180	0.48	1 200
C-DC-200	圆形	圆形	200	3.90	0.98	1 270	0.19	1 200
C-RC-100	方形	圆形	100	3.90	2.02	1 270	0.19	1 200
C-DR-100	方形	方形	100	3.90	2.04	1 270	0.19	1 200
C-SC-100	螺旋	圆形	100	3.90	2.03	1 270	0.19	1 200
注：试件编号“C-DC-HA-100”中“C”表示芯柱试件，“DC”表示内芯和外芯均采用圆形箍筋形式的芯柱，“HA”表示高轴压比试件，“100”表示箍筋间距为100 mm，“RC”表示外芯和内芯分别为方形和圆形箍筋形式的芯柱；“DR”表示外芯和内芯均采用方形箍筋形式的芯柱；“SC”表示外芯和内芯分别为螺旋型和圆形箍筋形式的芯柱。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 侧向约束系数和约束混凝土强度

Table 2. Confinement factors and strength of confined concrete

试件名称	${f'_{{\rm{el,s}}}}$	${f'_{{\rm{el,d}}}}$	${f'_{{\rm{el,h}}}}$	${K_{\rm{s}}}$	${K_{\rm{d}}}$	${K_{\rm{h}}}$	${f'_{{\rm{co}}}}$	${f'_{{\rm{ccs}}}}$	${f'_{{\rm{ccd}}}}$	${f'_{{\rm{cch}}}}$
CC	2.03	—	—	1.29	—	—	43.4	56.1	—	—
C-C-100	2.03	2.66	—	1.29	1.37	—	43.4	56.1	59.6	—
C-DC-100	2.03	2.66	3.46	1.29	1.37	1.47	43.4	56.1	59.6	63.7
C-DC-HA-100	2.03	2.66	3.46	1.29	1.37	1.47	43.4	56.1	59.6	63.7
C-DC-200	2.03	2.23	2.31	1.29	1.32	1.33	43.4	56.1	57.2	57.7
C-RC-100	2.03	2.38	3.19	1.29	1.34	1.44	43.4	56.1	58.1	62.3
C-DR-100	2.03	2.38	2.88	1.29	1.34	1.40	43.4	56.1	58.1	60.7
C-SC-100	2.03	2.78	3.58	1.29	1.39	1.48	43.4	56.1	60.2	64.3
注：${K_{\rm{s}}}$、${K_{\rm{d}}}$、${K_{\rm{h}}}$分别对应低约束区、中约束区、高约束区侧向约束因子；${f'_{{\rm{ccs}}}}$、${f'_{{\rm{ccd}}}}$、${f'_{{\rm{cch}}}}$分别对应低约束区、中约束区、高约束区混凝土峰值应力

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 计算结果与试验结果对比

Table 3. Comparison between calculated and measured results

试件名称		屈服荷载P_y/kN	屈服位移Δ_y/mm	峰值荷载P_m/kN	峰值位移Δ_m/mm	极限荷载P_u/kN	极限位移Δ_u/mm	位移延性系数μ
CC	试验值	484.8	13.0	551.0	25.3	468.3	55.4	4.3
CC	计算值	470.8	12.7	529.0	24.4	449.7	52.7	4.1
C-C-100	试验值	517.5	14.8	591.1	23.7	502.5	58.8	4.0
C-C-100	计算值	502.2	14.3	564.3	27.4	479.6	49.9	3.5
C-DC-100	试验值	554.1	17.7	622.6	39.5	529.2	55.2	3.1
C-DC-100	计算值	516.1	19.7	579.9	37.9	492.9	63.2	3.2
C-DC-HA-100	试验值	743.4	16.0	857.4	27.9	728.8	43.5	2.7
C-DC-HA-100	计算值	791.2	16.7	889.0	32.0	755.7	50.3	3.0
C-DC-200	试验值	576.2	11.1	651.5	29.5	553.7	40.9	3.7
C-DC-200	计算值	507.9	14.2	568.8	27.4	483.5	35.8	2.5
C-RC-100	试验值	581.2	14.1	649.4	24.7	552.0	48.2	3.4
C-RC-100	计算值	530.0	15.6	595.5	29.9	506.2	49.3	3.2
C-DR-100	试验值	553.2	15.1	631.2	26.4	536.6	48.2	3.2
C-DR-100	计算值	522.9	15.6	587.5	29.9	499.4	49.0	3.1
C-SC-100	试验值	578.7	15.5	652.2	34.4	554.4	53.9	3.5
C-SC-100	计算值	532.8	17.6	598.6	33.8	508.8	55.5	3.2

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

[1]	董三升, 赵均海, 雷自学等, 2012. 高强混凝土加芯柱恢复力特性研究. 中国公路学报, 25(4): 90—96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2012.04.015 Dong S. S., Zhao J. H., Lei Z. X., et al., 2012. Research on the restoring force of high-strength concrete columns with central reinforcement. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 25(4): 90—96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2012.04.015
[2]	范重, 钱稼茹, 吴学敏, 2001. 核心配筋柱抗震性能试验研究. 建筑结构学报, 22(1): 14—19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.2001.01.003 Fan Z., Qian J. R., Wu X. M., 2001. Experimental study on seismic behavior of concrete columns with central reinforcement. Journal of Building Structures, 22(1): 14—19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.2001.01.003
[3]	冯鹏, 强翰林, 叶列平, 2017. 材料、构件、结构的“屈服点”定义与讨论. 工程力学, 34(3): 36—46. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.03.0192 Feng P., Qiang H. L., Ye L. P., 2017. Discussion and definition on yield points of materials, members and structures. Engineering Mechanics, 34(3): 36—46. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.03.0192
[4]	郭子雄, 吕西林, 2004a. 高轴压比框架柱恢复力模型试验研究. 土木工程学报, 37(5): 32—38. Guo Z. X., Lü X. L., 2004a. Experimental study on the hysteretic model of RC columns with high axial compressive ratio. China Civil Engineering Journal, 37(5): 32—38.
[5]	郭子雄, 杨勇, 2004b. 恢复力模型研究现状及存在问题. 世界地震工程, 20(4): 47—51. Guo Z. X., Yang Y., 2004b. State-of-the-art of restoring force models for RC structures. World Earthquake Engineering, 20(4): 47—51.
[6]	黄永安, 2019. 外方内双螺旋箍筋约束混凝土柱轴压承载力计算方法. 铁道标准设计, 63(3): 130—137. Huang Y. A., 2019. Calculation method of axial compressive bearing capacity of concrete columns confined by double helix stirrups and rectangular stirrups. Railway Standard Design, 63(3): 130—137.
[7]	黄永安, 张超凡, 2019. 外方内双圆箍筋约束高强混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究. 工业建筑, 49(6): 87—93. Huang Y. A., Zhang C. F., 2019. Experimental research on the seismic behavior of high-strength concrete columns confined by double circular stirrups and rectangular stirrups. Industrial Construction, 49(6): 87—93.
[8]	姜磊, 郑春梅, 冯丽娜, 2020. 恢复力模型中求突变折点的一种新方法. 地震工程与工程振动, 40(2): 171—176. Jiang L., Zheng C. M., Feng L. N., 2020. A new method for dealing with the stiffness critical point in restoring force models. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 40(2): 171—176.
[9]	雷自学, 董三升, 郭军庆等, 2010. 高强混凝土加芯柱抗震性能试验研究. 建筑结构学报, 31(12): 83—91. Lei Z. X., Dong S. S., Guo J. Q., et al., 2010. Test study on seismic performance of high-strength concrete columns with central reinforcement. Journal of Building Structures, 31(12): 83—91.
[10]	李升才, 张诚紫, 2014. 高轴压比下密置焊接环式高强复合箍筋约束高强混凝土柱恢复力模型研究. 地震工程与工程振动, 34(6): 188—197. Li S. C., Zhang C. Z., 2014. Study on restoring force model for high strength concrete columns confined by butt-welded closed composite high strength stirrups with high axial compression ratios. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 34(6): 188—197.
[11]	李正良, 冯宏, 陈永庆, 2010. HSRC框架柱的恢复力特性. 西南交通大学学报, 45(6): 888—892. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2010.06.011 Li Z. L., Feng H., Chen Y. Q., 2010. Characteristics of restoring force of high strength reinforced concrete frame columns. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 45(6): 888—892. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2010.06.011
[12]	齐岳, 郑文忠, 2010. 核心高强混凝土柱荷载-位移恢复力模型. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 42(4): 531—535. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2010.04.006 Qi Y., Zheng W. Z., 2010. Restoring-force model of load versus displacement for concrete columns with high strength core. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 42(4): 531—535. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2010.04.006
[13]	邢国华, 王浩楠, 黄永安等, 2020. 高强混凝土多重复合芯柱抗震性能试验研究. 土木工程学报, 53(4): 50—60. Xing G. H., Wang H. N., Huang Y. A., et al., 2020. Experimental study on seismic behavior of high-strength concrete columns reinforced with multiple composite central reinforcement. China Civil Engineering Journal, 53(4): 50—60.
[14]	阎石, 肖潇, 阚立新等, 2005. 高强钢筋高强混凝土柱恢复力模型. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 21(2): 81—85. Yan S., Xiao X., Kan L. X., et al., 2005. Resilience model of high-strength reinforcement and high-strength concrete columns. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 21(2): 81—85.
[15]	张微敬, 张兵, 李振宝等, 2013. 强约束大尺寸钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究. 工程力学, 30(12): 236—241. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.02.0123 Zhang W. J., Zhang B., Li Z. B., et al., 2013. Experimental study on seismic performance of large scale reinforced concrete columns with strong confinement. Engineering Mechanics, 30(12): 236—241. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.02.0123
[16]	张艳青, 贡金鑫, 韩石, 2017. 钢筋混凝土杆件恢复力模型综述(Ⅰ). 建筑结构, 47(9): 65—70. Zhang Y. Q., Gong J. X., Han S., 2017. Reviews of restoring force model for reinforced concrete members (I). Building Structure, 47(9): 65—70.
[17]	张艳青, 贡金鑫, 韩石, 2018. 钢筋混凝土杆件恢复力模型综述(Ⅱ). 建筑结构, 48(18): 53—58. Zhang Y. Q., Gong Ji. X., Han S., 2018. Research advances in hysteretic model of reinforced concrete members (Ⅱ). Building Structure, 48(18): 53—58.
[18]	Belarbi A., Hsu T. T. C., 1994. Constitutive laws of concrete in tension and reinforcing bars stiffened by concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 91(4): 465—474.
[19]	Dhakal R. P., Maekawa K., 2002. Reinforcement stability and fracture of cover concrete in reinforced concrete members. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(10): 1253—1262. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1253)
[20]	Lehman D. E., 2000. Seismic performance of well-confined concrete bridge columns. Berkeley: University of California.
[21]	Mander J. B., Priestley M. J. N., Park R., 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8): 1804—1826. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
[22]	Park R., 1988. Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Kyoto: IAEE.
[23]	Priestley M. J. N., Park R., 1987. Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal, 84(1): 61—76.
[24]	Sezen H., Setzler E. J., 2008. Reinforcement slip in reinforced concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 105(3): 280—289.
[25]	Yin S. Y. L., Wang J. C., Wang P. H., 2012. Development of multi-spiral confinements in rectangular columns for construction automation. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 35(3): 309—320. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2012.655528