Does the Holocene Active Haixiu Fault Exist in the Centre of Haikou?
-
摘要: 海秀断裂近东西向展布于海口市中心，准确厘定其几何位置和最新活动特征对科学评价海口市地震危险性、地震构造和地球动力学具有重要科学意义。本文采用野外地质调查、微地貌测量、浅层人工地震勘探和钻孔联合剖面探测相结合的方法，针对前人确定的海口市中心城区全新世活动海秀断裂，分别在5个典型地点进行详细研究。首先，通过野外地质调查和微地貌测量，得到其中3个地点的地貌陡坎最大垂直落差为11～15 m；其次，跨地貌陡坎和海秀断裂实施了5条浅层人工地震勘探，结果显示，海秀断裂在地震剖面上反映微弱，断错特征不明显，推测断裂总体活动性较低。为验证该断裂的准确位置和最新活动特征，分别在海港路和人民公园开展了钻孔联合剖面探测，通过详细对比分析钻孔揭示的地层序列和地层年代，未发现因断裂活动导致的构造变形迹象，认为海秀断裂上新世以来在探测深度范围内不存在，海口市现有地貌陡坎应为海蚀阶地坎，可排除断裂陡坎的可能。原断裂沿线区域地震危险性被错误高估，经济建设和发展规划可不考虑该断裂的避让问题。Abstract: The Haixiu fault is located in the center of Haikou city, so, accurate determination of its geometric location and latest activity characteristics is of great scientific significance for scientific evaluation of seismic risk, seismotectonics and geodynamics in the Haikou City. The methods of field geological investigation, micro-geomorphology survey, shallow artificial seismic exploration and drilling joint profile detection are combined, the Holocene Haixiu fault, defined by predecessors, has been studied in detail in Yongwan road, Hai gang road, Binmao road, Renmin park and nearby the Meishe River. Firstly, the maximum vertical drop of geomorphologic scarps at 3 sites is 11-15 m by field geological survey and micro-geomorphology survey. Secondly, five shallow artificial seismic profiles have been carried out across the landform scarps and Haixiu fault. The results show that the response of existing the Haixiu fault is weak in the profiles. The characteristics of faulted strata are not obvious, therefore the activity of the fault is not strong. In order to verify the exact location and active characteristics of the fault, this study has carried out drilling joint profile exploration in Hai gang road and Ren min park respectively. Then through detailed comparative analysis of the stratigraphic sequence and age revealed by the borehole, Finally, no evidence of structural deformation caused by fault activity has been found. Last but not least, comprehensive research shows that the Haixiu fault does not exists in the exploration depth range since Pliocene, and the existing geomorphic scarps in the center of Haikou may be marine erosion terraces, which can exclude the possibility of fault scarps. The seismic risk of the area along the original Haixiu fault is overestimated, and the problem of avoiding the fault can not be considered in the economic construction and development planning, thus liberating a large number of valuable land resources in the center of Haikou.1) 2海南省地震局，2007. 海口市活断层探测与地震危险性评价工程报告. 海南省地震局内部报告。
-
图 3 浅层人工地震勘探线与钻孔位置平面图
Figure 3. Position diagram of the shallow seismic exploration lines and the drill holes
图 4 永万路浅层人工地震勘探反射剖面图与地质解释图
Figure 4. Profile of the shallow artificial seismic and geological exploration on the Yongwan Road
图 5 海港路浅层人工地震勘探反射剖面图与地质解释图
Figure 5. Profile of the shallow artificial seismic and geological exploration on the Haigang Road
图 6 滨贸路浅层人工地震勘探反射剖面图与地质解释图
Figure 6. Profile of the shallow artificial seismic exploration on the Binmao Road
图 7 人民公园浅层人工地震勘探反射剖面图与地质解释图
Figure 7. Profile of the shallow artificial seismic and geological exploration in the Renmin Park
图 8 美舍河浅层人工地震勘探反射剖面图与地质解释图
Figure 8. Profile of the shallow artificial seismic and geological exploration along the Meishe River
图 9 海港路钻孔联合剖面
Figure 9. Joint section of the drill holes at Haigang Road using hglzk1 to hglzk6
-
[1] 曹筠, 冉勇康, 许汉刚等, 2015. 宿迁城市活动断层探测多方法技术运用的典型案例. 地震地质, 37(2): 430—439. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.02.007Cao J., Ran Y. K., Xu H. G., et al., 2015. Typical case analysis on application of multi-method detection technique to active fault exploration in Suqian city. Seismology and Geology, 37(2): 430—439. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.02.007 [2] 柴炽章, 孟广魁, 杜鹏等, 2006. 隐伏活动断层的多层次综合探测——以银川隐伏活动断层为例. 地震地质, 28(4): 536—546. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2006.04.002Chai C. Z., Meng G. K., Du P., et al., 2006. Comprehensive multi-level exploration of buried active fault: an example of Yinchuan buried active Fault. Seismology and Geology, 28(4): 536—546. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2006.04.002 [3] 陈恩民, 黄咏茵, 1979. 1605年海南岛琼州大地震及其发震构造的初步探讨. 地震地质, 1(4): 37—44.Chen E. M., Huang Y. Y., 1979. Preliminary discussion on the 1605 Qiongzhou earthquake and its seismogenetic structure. Seismology and Geology, 1(4): 37—44. (in Chinese) [4] 陈恩民, 黄咏茵, 1989. 1605年海南岛琼州大地震的震害特征和发震构造研究. 地震学报, 11(3): 319—331.Chen E. M., Huang Y. Y., 1989. Characteristics of the seismic damage and analysis of the seismic structure of the 1605 Great earthquake of Qiongzhou, Hainan Island. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(3): 319—331. (in Chinese) [5] 邓起东, 2002. 城市活动断裂探测和地震危险性评价问题. 地震地质, 24(4): 601—605. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2002.04.015Deng Q. D., 2002. Exploration and seismic hazard assessment of active fault in Urban areas. Seismology and Geology, 24(4): 601—605. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2002.04.015 [6] 邓起东, 徐锡伟, 张先康等, 2003. 城市活动断裂探测的方法和技术. 地学前缘, 10(1): 93—104. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2003.01.012Deng Q. D., Xu X. W., Zhang X. K., et al., 2003. Methods and techniques for surveying and prospecting active faults in Urban areas. Earth Science Frontiers, 10(1): 93—104. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2003.01.012 [7] 方盛明, 张先康, 刘保金等, 2002. 探测大城市活断层的地球物理方法. 地震地质, 24(4): 606—613. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2002.04.016Fang S. M., Zhang X. K., Liu J. B., et al., 2002. Geophysical methods for the exploration of urban active faults. Seismology and Geology, 24(4): 606—613. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2002.04.016 [8] 胡久常, 白登海, 王薇华等, 2007. 琼州7.5级地震区深部电性异常及地震活动性研究. 地震学报, 29(3): 258—264. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2007.03.004Hu J. C., Bai D. H., Wang W. H., et al., 2007. Deep electrical anomaly in the M7.5 Qiongzhou earthquake region and its relation with future seismicity. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 29(3): 258—264. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2007.03.004 [9] 胡亚轩, 郝明, 秦姗兰等, 2018. 海南岛现今三维地壳运动与断裂活动性研究. 地球物理学报, 61(6): 2310—2321. doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0274Hu Y. X., Hao M., Qin S. L., et al., 2018. Present—day 3D crustal motion and fault activity in the Hainan Island. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(6): 2310—2321. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0274 [10] 雷启云, 柴炽章, 孟广魁等, 2011. 隐伏活断层钻孔联合剖面对折定位方法. 地震地质, 33(1): 45—55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.01.005Lei Q. Y., Chai C. Z., Meng G. K., et al., 2011. Method of locating buried active fault by composite drilling section doubling exploration. Seismology and Geology, 33(1): 45—55. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.01.005 [11] 李志雄, 赵文俊, 刘光夏, 2006. 1605年琼山大地震深部构造和应力状态研究. 华南地震, 26(1): 28—36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2006.01.005Li Z. X., Zhao W. J., Liu G. X., 2006. A study on deep crust structures and stress situation of the 1605 Qiongshan strong earthquake. South China Journal of Seismology, 26(1): 28—36. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2006.01.005 [12] 刘华国, 吴小江, 李峰等, 2018. 马袅-铺前断裂中段全新世活动特征研究. 震灾防御技术, 13(3): 588—599. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20180310Liu H. G., Wu X. J, Li F., et al., 2018. Active characteristics of the middle segment of Maniao-Puqian fault in the Holocene. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 13(3): 588—599. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11899/zzfy20180310 [13] 王萍, 苏旭, 田勤俭等, 2007. 西宁市北川河西岸断层、湟水断层活动性的钻探研究. 震灾防御技术, 2(2): 147—157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2007.02.005Wang P., Su X., Tian Q. J., et al., 2007. Drill data analysis on activities of Huangshuihe fault and Beichuanhe west fault in Xining city. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2(2): 147—157. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2007.02.005 [14] 王志成, 2006. 土氡测量在海口市活动断层探测中的初步应用. 华南地震, 26(4): 61—66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2006.04.009Wang Z. C., 2006. Preliminary application of soil radon measurement method in active fault survey in Haikou city. South China Journal of Seismology, 26(4): 61—66. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8662.2006.04.009 [15] 向宏发, 方仲景, 张晚霞等, 1993. 北京平原区隐伏断裂晚第四纪活动性的初步研究. 地震学报, 15(3): 385—388. [16] 向宏发, 2003. 隐伏活动构造探测研究的若干问题讨论. 地震地质, 25(3): 460—466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2003.03.011Xiang H. F., 2003. Some problems in the exploration and research of buried active fault. Seismology and Geology, 25(3): 460—466. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2003.03.011 [17] 徐起浩, 2007. 1605年琼州大地震陆陷成海和可能的海啸. 海洋学报, 29(3): 146—156.Xu Q. H., 2007. The land sank into the sea and possible tsunami by the great earthquake in Qiongzhou in China in 1605. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 29(3): 146—156. (in Chinese) [18] 徐锡伟, 计凤桔, 于贵华等, 2000. 用钻孔地层剖面记录恢复古地震序列: 河北夏垫断裂古地震研究. 地震地质, 22(1): 9—19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2000.01.002Xu X. W., Ji F. J., Yu G. H., et al., 2000. Reconstruction of Paleoearthquake sequence using stratigraphic records from drill logs: a study at the Xiadian fault, Beijing. Seismology and Geology, 22(1): 9—19. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2000.01.002 [19] 袁道阳, 王兰民, 何文贵等, 2008. 兰州市地震活断层探测新进展. 地震地质, 30(1): 236—249. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2008.01.017Yuan D. Y., Wang L. M., He W. G., et al., 2008. New progress of seismic active fault prospecting in Lanzhou city. Seismology and Geology, 30(1): 236—249. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2008.01.017 [20] 张新东, 王晓山, 沈繁銮等, 2013. 由现今小震资料研究琼北地区区域应力场和发震构造. 地震学报, 35(4): 451—460. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.04.001Zhang X. D., Wang X. S., Shen F. L., et al., 2013. The stress field and seismogenic structure in northern Hainan Island based on current small earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(4): 451—460. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.04.001 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(10)
计量
- 文章访问数: 165
- HTML全文浏览量: 58
- PDF下载量: 28
- 被引次数: 0
