• ISSN 1673-5722
  • CN 11-5429/P

离散Fréchet距离在强震台站场地分类中的应用

梁基冠 程印 赵岑

梁基冠, 程印, 赵岑. 离散Fréchet距离在强震台站场地分类中的应用[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2019, 14(4): 731-741. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190404
引用本文: 梁基冠, 程印, 赵岑. 离散Fréchet距离在强震台站场地分类中的应用[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2019, 14(4): 731-741. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190404
Liang Jiguan, Cheng Yin, Zhao Cen. Application of the Discrete Fréchet Distance in Site Classifications at Strong Motion Stations[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2019, 14(4): 731-741. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190404
Citation: Liang Jiguan, Cheng Yin, Zhao Cen. Application of the Discrete Fréchet Distance in Site Classifications at Strong Motion Stations[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2019, 14(4): 731-741. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190404

离散Fréchet距离在强震台站场地分类中的应用

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190404
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目 51708460

详细信息
    作者简介:

    梁基冠, 男, 生于1993年。硕士研究生。主要从事地震动衰减关系研究。Email:leungjg@163.com

    通讯作者:

    程印, 男, 生于1980年。博士, 讲师, 硕导。主要从事地震工程相关研究。Email:chengyin19830@163.com

Application of the Discrete Fréchet Distance in Site Classifications at Strong Motion Stations

  • 摘要: 当强震台站场地资料不完整时,所收集到的强震数据因缺乏准确的场地类别信息而难以有效利用。为解决这一问题,本文提出一种基于离散Fréchet距离的强震台站场地分类方法。将获取到的664个KiK-net台站场地按照《建筑抗震设计规范(GB 50011—2010)》进行分类,并构建2个数据集。利用数据集1得到Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类场地标准谱比曲线,并结合离散Fréchet距离对数据集2中的台站进行场地分类,统计分类成功率与误判率。统计结果表明,本文方法能较准确地对场地进行分类,且误判率在可接受范围内。将本文方法分类统计结果与斯皮尔曼秩相关系数法分类的成功率与误判率进行对比,结合本文方法分类后得到的平均谱比曲线,均可表明应用本文方法进行强震台站场地分类具有合理性。
  • 图  1  离散Fréchet距离与多边形链相似性

    Figure  1.  Discrete Fréchet distance and similarity between polygonal chains

    图  2  Kik-net台站场地类别及分布

    Figure  2.  Site class and distribution of Kik-net stations

    图  3  3类场地标准谱比曲线及其自然对数标准差曲线

    Figure  3.  Standard spectra ratio curves and natural logarithmic standard deviation for three site classses

    图  4  离散Fréchet距离场地分类算例

    Figure  4.  Site classifications using discrete Fréchet distance

    图  5  2种方法划分成功率及误判率

    Figure  5.  Success rates and failure rates of two classification methods

    图  6  分类前后3类场地平均谱比曲线及其自然对数标准差曲线

    Figure  6.  Standard spectra ratio curves and natural logarithmic standard deviation before and after classification for three site classes

    表  1  KiK-net台站场地分类结果

    Table  1.   Classification result of KiK-net stations

    场地类别 数量 比例/% 描述
    I 94 14.16 包括I0跟I1
    481 72.44 -
    36 5.42 -
    4 0.60 -
    5(剔除) 43 6.48 含有推测剪切波速
    6(剔除) 6 0.90 含有软夹层
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  地震动记录选取信息

    Table  2.   Details on ground motion record selection

    场地类别 数据集1 数据集2
    场地数量 记录数量/组 记录占比/% 场地数量 记录数量/组 记录占比/%
    I 61 4153 26.06 25 1418 31.99
    367 8624 54.11 33 2294 51.76
    24 3160 19.83 4 720 16.25
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  KGWH03场地钻孔及场地分类

    Table  3.   Boring Information and Site Classification of KGWH03

    层序 厚度/m 剪切波速/(m·s-1
    1 5.00 600.00
    2 19.00 1820.00
    3 26.00 2400.00
    4 2950.00
    等效剪切波速/(m·s-1 600.00
    覆盖层厚度/m 5.00
    场地类别 I
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 蒋其峰, 魏玮, 王红卫等, 2017.山东省场地类别分布及地震动峰值加速度区划调整.震灾防御技术, 12(3):501-510. http://zzfy.eq-j.cn/zzfyjs/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20170306&journal_id=zzfyjs
    王珊, 张郁山, 尤贺, 2014.场地划分标准对基岩地震动参数衰减关系的影响.震灾防御技术, 9(4):759-769. http://zzfy.eq-j.cn/zzfyjs/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20140403&journal_id=zzfyjs
    温瑞智, 冀昆, 任叶飞等, 2015.基于谱比法的我国强震台站场地分类.岩石力学与工程学报, 34(6):1236-1241. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YSLX201506018.htm
    赵万松, 2017.抗震设计规范中反应谱特征参数研究.合肥: 合肥工业大学.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2010.GB 50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
    Alt H., Godau M., 1995. Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, 5(1-2):75-91. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_arXiv.org_1307.2097
    Borcherdt R. D., 1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 60(1):29-61. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=0618ea10d16c1df048a3229894caa84b
    Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2003. The 2003 NEHRP recommended provisions for new buildings and other structures, part Ⅰ (provisions) and part Ⅱ (commentary). Washington, D. C.: FEMA.
    Eiter T., Mannila H., 1994. Computing discrete Fréchet distance. Vienna: Information System department, Technical University of Vienna.
    Fukushima Y., Bonilla L. F., Scotti O., et al., 2007. Site classification using horizontal-to-vertical response spectral ratios and its impact when deriving empirical ground-motion prediction equations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 11(5):712-724. doi: 10.1080/13632460701457116
    Ghasemi H., Zare M., Fukushima Y., et al., 2009. Applying empirical methods in site classification, using response spectral ratio (H/V):A case study on Iranian strong motion network (ISMN). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(1):121-132.
    Lermo J., Chávez-García F. J., 1993. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83(5):1574-1594. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=fbe8db440669882caac22472a98d6f26
    Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), 2007. Building standard law of Japan. Tokyo: Building Center of Japan.
    Nakamura Y., 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Railway Technical Research Institute, 30(1):25-33. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/308073825_A_method_for_dynamic_characteristics_estimation_of_subsurface_using_microtremor_on_the_ground_surface
    Okada Y., Kasahara K., Hori S., et al., 2004. Recent progress of seismic observation networks in Japan -Hi-net, F-net, K-NET and KiK-net. Earth Planets & Space, 56(8):xv-xxviii.
    Wen R. Z., Ren Y. F., Shi D. C., 2011. Improved HVSR site classification method for free-field strong motion stations validated with Wenchuan aftershock recordings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 10(3):325-337. doi: 10.1007/s11803-011-0069-x
    Yamazaki F., Ansary M. A., 1997. Horizontal-to-vertical spectrum ratio of earthquake ground motion for site characterization. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26(7):671-689. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199707)26:7<671::AID-EQE669>3.0.CO;2-S
    Zhao J. X., Irikura K., Zhang J., et al., 2006. An empirical site-classification method for strong-motion stations in Japan using H/V response spectral ratio. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(3):914-925. doi: 10.1785/0120050124
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  53
  • HTML全文浏览量:  40
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-12-19
  • 刊出日期:  2019-12-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回