• ISSN 1673-5722
  • CN 11-5429/P

用改进的经验格林函数方法模拟唐山地震动

席桂梅 郭雷 何书耕 张诗若 闵也 李启成

席桂梅, 郭雷, 何书耕, 张诗若, 闵也, 李启成. 用改进的经验格林函数方法模拟唐山地震动[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2019, 14(1): 97-107. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190110
引用本文: 席桂梅, 郭雷, 何书耕, 张诗若, 闵也, 李启成. 用改进的经验格林函数方法模拟唐山地震动[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2019, 14(1): 97-107. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190110
Xi Guimei, Guo Lei, He Shugeng, Zhang Shiruo, Min Ye, Li Qicheng. Ground Motion Simulations of Tangshan with Improved Empirical Green's Function[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2019, 14(1): 97-107. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190110
Citation: Xi Guimei, Guo Lei, He Shugeng, Zhang Shiruo, Min Ye, Li Qicheng. Ground Motion Simulations of Tangshan with Improved Empirical Green's Function[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2019, 14(1): 97-107. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190110

用改进的经验格林函数方法模拟唐山地震动

doi: 10.11899/zzfy20190110
基金项目: 

辽宁省教育厅项目 551610001219

详细信息
    作者简介:

    席桂梅, 女, 生于1963年。副教授。主要从事地球物理学研究。E-mail:378086149@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    李启成, 男, 生于1963年。副教授。主要从事地震工程学研究。E-mail:731732866@qq.com

Ground Motion Simulations of Tangshan with Improved Empirical Green's Function

  • 摘要: 建筑物的抗震设防需要尽可能地掌握未来大地震强震动记录信息,但大地震强震动记录的匮乏阻碍了抗震设防实践的发展。经验格林函数方法作为模拟地震动的主要方法,可以提供可靠的大地震强震动记录,但也存在着许多问题,如缺乏对大地震断层滑动分布不均匀的描述、用经验确定小震数目、模拟方法受到大小地震相似条件的限制等。文中对上述经验格林函数方法存在的问题进行了研究,改进的经验格林函数方法,有效地解决了上述问题。并用其对唐山大地震进行了模拟,并把模拟的地震动时程和反应谱与实际记录相比较,发现用改进方法模拟的地震动加速度反应谱比用未改进方法模拟结果更接近实际的地震动记录加速度反应谱。由此说明改进的经验格林函数可更准确的模拟地震动。
  • 图  1  唐山主震断层划分和凹凸体位置

    Figure  1.  The fault division and the position of the convex and concave body of the Tangshan earthquak

    图  2  在北京饭店一楼记录的宁河地震东西向加速度

    Figure  2.  The west-east acceleration of the Ninghe earthquake recorded at the first floor of the Beijing Hotel

    图  3  3种方法获得的唐山大地震东西向反应谱比较

    Figure  3.  Comparison of the response spectra in west-east direction of the Tangshan earthquake from three methods

    图  4  3种途径获得的唐山大地震东西向加速度时程

    Figure  4.  The west-east acceleration time histories of the Tangshan earthquake from the three approaches

    图  5  北京饭店一楼记录到的宁河地震南北向加速度时程

    Figure  5.  the north-south acceleration record of the Ninghe earthquake received at the first floor of the Beijing Hotel

    图  6  3种方法获得的南北向反应谱比较

    Figure  6.  Comparison of the response spectra in the north-south direction of the Tangshan earthquake from three methods

    图  7  3种途径获得的唐山大地震南北向加速度时程

    Figure  7.  Acceleration time histories of the Tangshan earthquake in the direction of north-south recorded from the three approaches

    图  8  北京饭店地下室记录的宁河地震东西向加速度记录

    Figure  8.  West-east acceleration time history of the Ninghe earthquake recorded at the basement of the Beijing Hotel

    图  9  3种途径获得的唐山地震东西向反应谱比较

    Figure  9.  Comparison of the response spectra of the Tangshan earthquake in direction of west-east from three approaches

    图  10  3种途径获得的唐山地震东西向加速度时程

    Figure  10.  The acceleration time histories of the Tangshan earthquake in the direction of west-east from the three approaches

    图  11  北京饭店地下室记录的宁河地震南北向加速度记录

    Figure  11.  The north-south acceleration of the Ninghe earthquake recorded in the basement of the Beijing Hotel

    图  12  3种途径获得的唐山地震南北向反应谱比较

    Figure  12.  Comparison of the response spectra of theTangshan earthquake in the direction of north-south at the Beijing Hotel basement from three approaches

    图  13  3种途径获得的唐山地震南北向加速度时程

    Figure  13.  The acceleration time histories of the Tangshan earthquake in the direction of north-south from the three approaches

    图  14  官厅水库记录的宁河地震南北向加速度记录

    Figure  14.  The north-south acceleration time history of the Ninghe earthquake recorded at the Guanting Reservoir

    图  15  3种途径获得的唐山地震南北向反应谱比较

    Figure  15.  Comparison of the response spectra of the Tangshan earthquake in direction of South-North from three approaches

    图  16  3种途径获得的唐山地震南北方向加速度时程

    Figure  16.  The north-south acceleration time histories of the Tangshan earthquake recorded from the three approaches

    图  17  官厅水库记录的宁河地震竖直向加速度时程

    Figure  17.  The acceleration time history of the Ninghe earthquake recorded at the Guanting Reservoir in vertical direction

    图  18  3种途径获得的唐山地震竖直向反应谱比较

    Figure  18.  Comparison of response spectra of the Tangshan earth quake vertical direction from the three approaches

    图  19  3种途径获得的唐山地震竖方向加速度时程

    Figure  19.  The vertical acceleration time histories of the Tangshan earthquake from the three approaches

    图  20  模拟误差

    Figure  20.  Simulation error

    表  1  唐山大地震断层参数

    Table  1.   Fault parameters of the Tangshan earthquake

    断层编号 走向/° 倾角/° M0/dyne·cm L×W/km2 D/m Δσ/bar
    1 30 80 7.0×1026 57×20 1.38 20
    2 50 80 7.0×1026 57×20 1.38 20
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  宁河地震(MS 6.9)参数

    Table  2.   The Ninghe earthquake parameters (MS 6.9)

    震中位置 震源深度/km 发震时刻 走向/° 倾角/° M0/dyne·cm L×W/km2 Δσ/bar D/m
    39°17′N
    118°47′E
    17 1976-11-9
    21:53
    330 39 8.0×1025 18×9 35 0.672
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  大地震子断层含子事件个数

    Table  3.   The mumber of sub-events in the main earthquake

    子断层编号 NL NW ND
    1 4 3 3
    2 4 3 3
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 国家地震局《一九七六年唐山地震》编辑组, 1982.一九七六年唐山地震.北京:地震出版社.
    李启成, 2010.经验格林函数方法模拟地震动研究.哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所.
    李启成, 孙颍川, 闫晓丹, 2016.用格林函数方法模拟卢龙地震.地球物理学进展, 31(5):1947-1952. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzgcygczd200902003
    罗奇峰, 1989.近场加速度的半经验合成.哈尔滨:国家地震局工程力学研究所.
    王海云, 2004.近场强地震动预测的有限断层震源模型.哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y622304
    吴迪, 2008.基于凹凸体模型的地震动半经验合成研究.上海:同济大学.
    谢小碧, 1988.理论地震图方法及其在研究震源过程方面的应用.北京:中国科学院地球物理研究所.
    药晓东, 章文波, 于湘伟, 2015.2008年汶川8.0级大地震近场强地面运动的模拟.地球物理学报, 58(3):886-903. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqwlxb201503017
    张之立, 李钦祖, 谷继成等, 1980.唐山地震的破裂过程及其力学分析.地震学报, 2(2):111-129. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=HY000001790762
    周蕙兰, 1985.浅源走滑大震震源过程的某些特征.地球物理学报, 28(6):579-587. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.1985.06.004
    朱传镇, 1985.唐山及其邻区的地震活动.见: 刘恢先主编, 唐山大地震震害.北京: 地震出版社, 1-16.
    Beresnev I. A., Atkinson G. M., 1998. Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 northridge, California, earthquake. Ⅰ. Validation on rock sites. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88 (6):1392-1401.
    Boore D. M., 2003. Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160 (3-4):635-676. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_doaj-articles_773ad1cbf1dcba3266bb060c1201c3cd
    Irikura K., 1983. Semi-empirical estimation of strong ground motions during large earthquakes. Bull Disas Prev Res Inst, Kyoto University, 33:63-104. https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2433/124917
    Irikura K., 1986. Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green's function. In: Proceedings of the 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium. December 8, Tokyo, 151-156.
    Irikura K., 1989. Prediction of strong ground motion using empirical Green's function-some problems of synthetic procedure of ground motion. Disaster prevention research institute annuals, Kyoto University, 32 (B-1):41-52. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120001178494/en/
    Irikura K., Kamae K., 1994. Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical Green's function technique. Annals of Geophysics, 37 (6):1721-1743. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=Doaj000000629618
    Irikura K., 2000. Prediction of strong motions from future earthquakes caused by active faults-case of the Osaka basin. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland: IAEE.
    Irikura K., Miyake H., Iwata T., 2004. Recipe for predicting strong ground motions from future large earthquakes. Disaster prevention research institute annuals, Kyoto University, 47 (A), 25-45.
    Irikura K., 2006. Predicting strong ground motions with a "recipe". Bull disas prev res inst Univ Tokyo, 81:341-352.
    James M., 2002, Earthquake Source Studies Related to Strong Ground Motion Estimates. Report of Japan's Ministry of Culture, Science and Technology, 664-670. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=77d433887077f8d263b928df128a284e
  • 加载中
图(20) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  88
  • HTML全文浏览量:  37
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-06-29
  • 刊出日期:  2019-03-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回